Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Dossier: Energía y Derechos Humanos: los retos de la Transición Energética
Regular articles

Violações de Direitos Humanos e Direitos da Personalidade pelas Empresas Transnacionais: Uma Análise Crítica das Regras de Haia sobre Arbitragem

Anna Carolyne Batistella Bianchini
Unicesumar
Bio
Daniela Menengoti Gonçalves Ribeiro
Unicesumar
Bio
Andréa Carla de Moraes Pereira Lago
Unicesumar
Bio

Published 2024-09-17

Keywords

  • Access to Justice Arbitration. Personality Rights. Human Rights. Transnational Companies,
  • Access to Justice

How to Cite

Batistella Bianchini, A. C., Menengoti Gonçalves Ribeiro, D., & Carla de Moraes Pereira Lago, A. (2024). Violações de Direitos Humanos e Direitos da Personalidade pelas Empresas Transnacionais: Uma Análise Crítica das Regras de Haia sobre Arbitragem. Homa Publica - Revista Internacional De Derechos Humanos Y Empresas, 8(1), e:132. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/44421

Abstract

Transnational companies often operate in underdeveloped countries and sometimes violate the human rights of their workers and other individuals involved in their operations. In this context, the United Nations created some guiding principles for companies on human rights in 2011, but these principles have a soft law nature, therefore, they are not legally binding. Furthermore, it is observed that in some underdeveloped countries, the sluggishness of the procedure, the costly process, and even the corruption of their agents hinder the resolution of these conflicts, at least effectively. Faced with this situation, transnational companies seek more suitable mechanisms for resolving these conflicts. Therefore, the problem of this research is to determine whether arbitration is an appropriate conflict resolution mechanism in this scenario of violations, from the perspective of its victims. To do this, the approach method to be adopted will be deductive, with a historical and comparative procedure, using juridical interpretative, exegetical, systematic, and critical explanation, whose study technique will be based on national and international bibliographic research. Furthermore, its objective is to analyze transnational companies in the era of globalization, arbitration as a conflict resolution instrument between transnational companies (TNCs) and victims of human rights violations and personality rights, as well as the 2019 Hague Rules. Finally, it is concluded that although the Hague Rules offer reasonable contributions to mitigate inequality between the parties, the crucial challenge of economic imbalance between the parties persists, especially for individuals affected by these violations, as they lack financial resources compared to the power of transnational companies (TNCs), and this disparity between the parties cannot be resolved through arbitration either.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. ANDERSON, S.; CAVANAGH, J. 2020, 4 december. Top 200: the rise of corporate global power. 2000. Instituto de Estudos Políticos. Disponível em: https://corpwatch.org/article/top-200-rise-corporate-global-power#overview. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
  2. BENEDETTELLI. M. V. 2015, 1 december. Human rights as a litigation tool in international arbitration: reflecting on the ECHR experience. Arbitration International. V. 31, pp. 631–659. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/arbitration/article-abstract/31/4/631/2739052?redirectedFrom=fulltext. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2024.
  3. BILCHITZH, D. 2010, junho. O Marco Ruggie: Uma Proposta Adequada para as Obrigações de Direitos Humanos das Empresas?. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, v. 7, n. 12, pp. 209-241. Disponivel em ttps://bdjur.stj.jus.br/jspui/bitstream/2011/37484/marco_ruggie_uma_bilchitz.pdf. Acesso em: 02 de abr. de 2024.
  4. BLACKABY, N.; PARTASIDES Q.C., Constantine; R., Alan; H. 2015. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. 6. ed. Nova York: Oxford.
  5. CARVALHO, B. R. 2021. As Regras de Haia sobre Arbitragem de Direitos Humanos e Empresas (2019): um contributo para a solução de conflitos entre empresas transnacionais e vítimas de violações de direitos humanos? [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade Federal da Paraíba]. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufpb.br/jspui/bitstream/123456789/22543/1/BrunaRab%c3%aaloCarvalho_Dissert.pdf. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
  6. COELHO, R. D. 2023. As negociações de um Tratado sobre empresas transnacionais e direitos humanos na ONU. Site Brasil de Fato: Uma visão popular do Brasil e do mundo. Disponível em: https://www.brasildefato.com.br/quem-somos. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
  7. CONVENTION FOR THE PACIFIC SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES. The Hague, 1899. Disponível em: https://docs.pca-cpa.org/2016/01/1899-Convention-for-the-Pacific-Settlement-of-International-Disputes.pdf. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
  8. CRONSTEDT, C.; EIJSBOUTS, J.; MARGOLIS, A.; SCHELTEMA, M.; THOMPSON, R. C.; RATNER, S..2017, 16 november. International Arbitration of Business and Human Rights: a step forward. Disponível em: http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2017/11/16/international-arbitration-business-human-rights-step-forward/. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.
  9. DRUMMOND, A. B. C. 2021. É POSSÍVEL UTILIZAR A ARBITRAGEM PARA A PROTEÇÃO DOS DIREITOS HUMANOS? FGV BLOG DE ARBITRAGEM. Disponível em: https://www.fgvblogdearbitragem.com.br/post/%C3%A9-poss%C3%ADvel-utilizar-a-arbitragem-para-a-prote%C3%A7%C3%A3o-dos-direitos-humanos. Acesso em: 05 de abr. de 2024.
  10. FACHIN, M. G. 2016, 30 november. Ponto cego do Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos: uma superação do paradigma estatocêntrico e a responsabilidade internacional de empresas violadoras de direitos humanos. Homa Publica: Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos e Empresas, Curitiba, v. 01, n. 01, p. 1-18. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30423. Acesso em: 01 abri. 2024.
  11. FARIAS, C. C. De; BRAGA NETTO, F. P.; ROSENVALD, N. 2019. Novo tratado de responsabilidade civil. São Paulo: SaraivaJur.
  12. FRANCISCO, W. C. 2024. Empresas Transnacionais. Brasil Escola. Disponível em: https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/geografia/empresas-transnacionais.htm. Acesso em 09 de abril de 2024.
  13. LAZAREFF, S. 2005. L’arbitrage singe ou comment assassiner l’arbitrage. Global Reflections in International Law, Commerce and Dispute Resolution: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Robert Briner. ICC.
  14. LEAGUE OF NATIONS. 1927. Convention on the Execution of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Geneva. Disponível em: https://treaties.un.org/pages/LONViewDetails.aspx?src=LON&id=549&chapter=30&clang=_en. Acesso em: 01 abri. 2024.
  15. LEAGUE OF NATIONS. 1923. Protocol on arbitration clauses. Geneva. Disponível em: https://treaties.un.org/pages/LONViewDetails.aspx?src=LON&id=549&chapter=30&clang=_en. Acesso em: 01 abri. 2024.
  16. LEAL, M. E. S. 2020. Direitos Humanos e empresas: Uma análise histórica sobre o tratamento das Nações Unidas conferido à temática e propostas para seu aperfeiçoamento. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos e Empresas, Vol. IV. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30759/21898. Acesso em 25 de abr. 2024.
  17. SARMENTO, D. 2006. Direitos Fundamentais e relações privadas. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.
  18. SAUVANT, K. P. 2015. The Negotiations of the United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations: Experience and Lessons Learned. Journal of World Investment and Trade, v. 16. p. 11-87. Disponível em: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2991265. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.
  19. SHAW, M. 2017. International Law. 8. ed. Cambridge University Press: United Kingdom.
  20. THE HAGUE RULES OS BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS. 2019. The Hague. Disponível em: https://www.cilc.nl/cms/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/The-Hague-Rules-on-Business-and-Human-Rights-Arbitration_CILC-digital-version.pdf. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024..
  21. UNITED NATIONS. 1945. Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.
  22. UNITED NATIONS. 1958. Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. New York. Disponível em: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=080000028002a36b. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.
  23. UNITED NATIONS. 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. New York. Disponível em: https://www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2024.
  24. UNITED NATIONS. 1965. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Convention. Washington DC. Disponível em: https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/documents/ICSID%20Convention%20English.pdf. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.
  25. UNITED NATIONS. 2006. UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985 with amendments as adopted in 2006. New York. Disponível em: https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media-documents/uncitral/en/19-09955_e_ebook.pdf. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.
  26. UNITED NATIONS. 1976. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Arbitration Rules. New York. Disponível em: https://www.jus.uio.no/lm/un.arbitration.rules.1976/. Acesso em: 01 de abr. de 2024.