Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018)
Regular articles

Duty of surveillance, human rights and transnational corporations: a review of the different models of fight against impunity

Adoración Guamán
Universitat de València | Valéncia, España
Bio

Published 2018-01-31

Keywords

  • Due diligence,
  • Prevention,
  • Duty of care,
  • Textile,
  • Human Rights,
  • Transnational corporations
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Guamán, A. (2018). Duty of surveillance, human rights and transnational corporations: a review of the different models of fight against impunity. Homa Publica - Revista Internacional De Derechos Humanos Y Empresas, 2(1), e:026. Retrieved from https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/HOMA/article/view/30552

Abstract

The article starts from the need to develop internationally binding standards on transnational corporations and human rights that would put an end to the impunity enjoyed by the former when, directly or through the various links in their supply chain, they cause violations of these rights, as well as ensuring reparation for the victims. The textile sector, fundamentally in the links of the supply chains located in different countries of Asia, is one of those that presents a greater index of violations of human rights in general and labor rights in particular. For this reason, the article uses the example of this sector to highlight both the impact of these violations and the ineffectiveness of the mechanisms currently in place to prevent them. This statement is made in the article together with the recognition of the existence of normative frameworks already in force, such as French law, and ongoing initiatives, such as the Sanchez-Candeltey Initiative, which represent progress in the establishment of binding standards that subject the actions of transnational companies to respect for Human Rights. However, and this is the fundamental thesis of the article, these initiatives continue to be partial for the control of entities such as TNCs, which because of their transnational activity easily escape the control established in state or regional normative frameworks. In this sense, the article argues that the essential element to achieve the end of impunity and to advance towards the eradication of phenomena such as modern slavery is the adoption of a legally binding international instrument, such as the one being negotiated in the framework of Resolution 26/9.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR-CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS (AFL-CIO). Responsibility Outsourced: Social Audits, Workplace Certification and Twenty Years of Failure to Protect Worker Rights. 2013. Disponible en https://www.ituc-csi.org/responsibility-outsourced-social

APARICIO TOVAR, J.; VALDÉS DE LA VEGA, B. (Dir.) La Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas en España: concepto, actores e instrumentos. Albacete: Bomarzo, 2011.

AUGENSTEIN, Daniel; UNIV. DE EDIMBURGO .Study of the Legal Framework on Human Rights and the Environment Applicable to European Enterprises Operating Outside the European Union. 2009. Disponible en http://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/newsroom/cf/itemdetail.cfm?item_id=3334

BARRET, E. The doctrine of Forum non Conveniens. 35 Cal. L. Rev. 380, 1947.

BERRÓN, G. Economic Power, Democracy and Human Rights. A New International Debate on Human Rights and Corporations. Sur Journal. No.20, 2014.

CLEAN CLOTHES CAMPAIGN. European Union and the Bangladesh garment industry: The case for a trade investigation. 2017.

CLEAN CLOTHES CAMPAIGN. Four years after Rana Plaza: Steps in the right direction but a lot remains to be done. 2017. Disponible en https://cleanclothes.org/news/2017/04/21/four-years-after-rana-plaza

CLEAN CLOTHES CAMPAIGN. Who pays for our clothing from Lidl and KiK?, A study into the impact of buying practices of the discounters Lidl and KiK in Bangladesh and the precarisation of working conditions in German retailing. 2008. Disponible en https://cleanclothes.org/resources/national-cccs/lidl-kik-eng.pdf/view

CUZACQ, N. Commentaire des propositions de loi relatives au devoir de vigilance des sociétés mères et des entreprises donneuses d'ordre. Revue de droit du travail, Nº. 4, 2014, págs. 265-266.

DEVA, S. Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations. Humanizing Business. New York: Routledge, 2012.

ESTEVE, J.E. La estrecha interdependencia entre la criminalidad de las empresas transnacionales y las violaciones al derecho internacional de los derechos humanos y del medio ambiente: lecciones del caso Bhopal. Revista electrónica de estudios internacionales (REEI), Nº. 32, 2016

ESTEVE, J.E. Los Principios Rectores sobre las empresas transnacionales y los derechos humanos en el marco de las Naciones Unidas para «proteger, respetar y remediar»: ¿hacia la responsabilidad de las corporaciones o la complacencia institucional? Anuario Español de derecho internacional, Nº27, 2011.

GARCÍA, M. A. Acuerdos Globales Multilaterales, una nueva expresión del derecho transnacional del trabajo. RDS, Nº70, 2015. El texto del acuerdo puede encontrarse en: http://bangladeshaccord.org/wp-content/uploads/the_accord.pdf.

GUAMÁN, A. La cooperación reguladora.

GUAMÁN, A. TTIP: el asalto de las multinacionales contra la democracia. Akal, 2015

GUAMÁN, A.; CONESA, J. El CETA al descubierto: las consecuencias del Tratado entre la UE y Canadá sobre los derechos sociales. Albacete: Bomarzo, 2016.

GUAMÁN, A.; JIMENEZ, P. Los acuerdos comerciales como estrategia de dominación del capital. Las amenazas del CETA y del TTIP, editorial Pol·len, 2016.

HERNÁNDEZ, A. Accidentes aéreos y forum non conveniens. Algunas cuestiones en torno al asunto Honeywell en España. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional, Vol. 4, Nº 2, Ouctubre 2012.

NICOL, D. The constitutional protection of capitalism. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010.

OIT. Global Stimates for Modern Slavery, forced labour and forced marriage. 2017. Disponible en http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/publication/wcms_575479.pdf.

PRIETO, J.; ESPINOZA, G. A binding treaty on corporate responsibility: a global solution to address the problem of corporate impunity. Lessons learned from Aguinda vs Chevron. HOMA Publica: International Journal on Human Rigths and Business, Nº2, 2017.

PRINCE, P. Bhopal, Bougainville and OkTedi: Why Australia's Forum Non Conveniens Approach Is Better. 47 1CLQ, 1998.

REINECKE, J.; DONAGHEY, J. After Rana Plaza: Building coalitional power for labour rights between unions and (consumption-based) social movement organisations. Organization, 22, Nº. 5, 2015.

RODOTÀ, S. Códigos de conducta: entre hard y soft law, Real Pérez, A., (Coordinadora), Códigos de conducta y actividad económica, M. Pons, Madrid, 2010

SERVAIS, J.M. Algunas reflexiones más sobre una cuestión espinosa: la responsabilidad social de las empresas. Derecho PUCP, N. 64, 2010.

TERWINDT, C.; SAAGE-MAASS, M. Liability of Social Auditors in the Textile Industry. European Center for Consitutional and Social Rights. 2016.

ZHENJIE, H. Forum Non Conveniens: An Unjustified Doctrine. Netherlands International Law Review, Nº 48, 2001.

ZUBIZARRETA, Juan Hernández. Las empresas transnacionales frente a los derechos humanos. Historia de una asimetría normativa. Vitoria: Ed Egoa, 2009.