Vol. 4 Núm. 1 (2020)
Artículos regulares

[Retracted Article] Extraterritorial protection of human rights according to US civil jurisprudence

Dimitris Liakopoulos
EUA
Biografía
Capa Verde escrito Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos e Empresas, 2020 Volume 04
Publicado December 18, 2020
Cómo citar
LIAKOPOULOS, D. [Retracted Article] Extraterritorial protection of human rights according to US civil jurisprudence. Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas, v. 4, n. 1, p. e:066, 18 dic. 2020.

Resumen

The editorial team of Homa Publica - Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos y Empresas proceeded to retract the research due to the non compliance with the editorial norms.

Citas

  1. ACEVES, W.J., The anatomy of torture. A documentary history of Filártiga v. Peña-Irala, ed. Brill/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston, 2007.
  2. BAUMANN-PAULY, D., NOLAN, J., Business and human rights: From principles to practice, ed. Routledge, London & New York, 2016.
  3. BAZILER, M.J., "Abolishing the Act of State Doctrine", in University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1986, pp. 325ss.
  4. BLUM, J.M., STEINHARDT, R.G., "Federal jurisdiction over international human rights claims. The Alien Tort Claim Act after Filártiga v. Peña-Irala", in Harvard International Law Journal, 22, 1981, pp. 53ss.
  5. BOGHRATY, B., Organizational compliance and ethics, Wolters Kluwer, New York, 2018, pp. 356ss.
  6. BRADLEY, C., International law in the U.S. Legal system, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013.
  7. BRADLEY, C.A., International law in the US legal system, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.
  8. BURLEY, A.M., "The Alien Tort Statute and the Judiciary Act of 1789: A pledge of honor", in The American Journal of International Law, 1989, pp. 461, 467-468
  9. BUSSANI, M., SEBOK, A.J., Comparative tort law. Global perspectives, Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, 2015, pp. 76ss.
  10. BUXBAUM, H.L., "The scope and limitations of the presumption against extraterritoriality", in American Journal of International Law Unbound, 2016.
  11. CARNER, R., HANDLEY, L., Does torture prevention work? Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2017, pp. 2422ss.
  12. CASTO, W.R., "Federal Courts’ protective jurisdiction over torts committed in violation of the law of nations", in Connecticut Law Review, 1986, pp. 467ss.
  13. CHADWICK, M., Piracy and the origins of universal jurisdiction. On stranger tides? ed. Brill, The Hague, 2019, pp. 56ss.
  14. CHAPMAN, N.S., "Due process of war", in Notre Dame Law Review, 94 (2), 2018, pp. 648ss.
  15. CHINYERE IKEGBUNAM, K., "Touching the concerns of Kiobel: Corporate liability and jurisdictional remedies in response to Kiobel vs. Royal Dutch Petroleum", in American Indian Law Review, 39, 2014, pp. 202ss.
  16. CLARK, B.R., "Tel-Oren, Filartiga and the meaning of the Alien Tort Statute", in The University of Chicago Law Review Dialogue, 80, 2013, pp. 180ss.
  17. D’AMATO, A., "Judge’s bork conception of international law is profoundly mistaken", in American Journal of International Law, 79, 1985, pp. 100ss.
  18. D’AMATO, A.A., "The Alien Tort Statute and the founding of the Constitution", in American Journal of International Law, 1988, pp. 62ss
  19. D’ZURILLA, W.T., "Individual responsibility for torture under international law", in Tulane Law Review, 56, 1981, pp. 186ss.
  20. DANAHER, M., "Torture as a tort in violation of international law: Filártiga v. Peña-Irala", in Stanford Law Review, 33, 1981, pp. 353ss.
  21. DICKINSON, E.D., "The Law of Nations as part of the national law of the United States", in University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 101, 1952, pp. 26ss.
  22. DODGE, W.S., "Alien Tort Litigation the road not taken", in Notre Dame Law Review, 89, 2014, pp. 1578ss.
  23. ENGLE, K., MIGUEL, Z., DAVIS, M.D., Anti-impunity and the human rights agenda, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016.
  24. FLETCHER, W.A., "International human rights in American Courts", in Virginia Law Review, 93, 2007, pp. 7ss.
  25. FORD, C.M., WILLIAMS, W.S., Complex battle spaces. The law of armed conflict and the dynamics of modern warfare, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018.
  26. HADLEY LOUDEN, J., "The domestic application of international human rights law: Evolving the species", in Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 5, 1982, pp. 162, 177ss.
  27. HANSEN, H., Intellectual property law and policy, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2013
  28. JAIN, A.G., Universal civil jurisdiction in international law, in Indian Journal of International Law, 55, 2015, pp. 209ss.
  29. JANIS, M.W., NOYES, J.F., Teacher’s manual. Cases and commentary on international law, West Academic, St. Paul, Minnesota, 2006.
  30. KACZOROWSKA-IRELAND, A., Public international law, ed. Routledge, London & New York, 2015
  31. KOH, H.H., "Transnational public law litigation", in Yale Law Journal, 100, 1991, pp. 2347, 2366ss.
  32. KONTOROVICH, E., "The piracy analogy: Modern universal jurisdiction’s hollow Foundation", in Harvard International Law Journal, 2004, pp. 183ss
  33. KOUTRAKOS, P., SKORDAS, A., The law and practice of piracy at sea. European and international perspectives, Hart Publishing, Oxford & Oregon, Portland, 2014.
  34. KU, J.G., "Kiobel and the surprising death of universal jurisdiction under the Alien Tort Statute", in American Journal of International Law (Agora: Reflections on Kiobel), 107, 2013, pp. 835ss.
  35. LIAKOPOULOS, D., "Transnational corporations: Criminal liability and compulsion in international criminal justice”, in Revista Juridica FURB, 2018, pp. 48ss
  36. LOWE, A., "Customary international law and international human rights law: A proposal for the expansion of the alien tort statute", in Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 23 (3), 2013, pp. 525ss.
  37. MAYERFELD, J., The promise of human rights: Constitutional government, democratic legitimacy and international law, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 2016, pp. 243ss.
  38. MCCAFFREY, S.C., Understanding international law, LexisNexis, New York, 2006.
  39. MEJIA, M.Q., KOJIMA, C., SAWYER, M., Piracy at sea, ed. Springer, Berlin, 2013.
  40. MORA, P.D., "The Alien Tort Statute after "Kiobel": The possibility for unlawful assertions of universal civil jurisdiction still remains", in International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 63, 2014, pp. 699ss.
  41. NOLLKAEMPER, A., PLAKOKEFALOS, I., SCHECHINGER, J., The practice of shared responsibility in international law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018.
  42. RAHMAN CHOWDURY, A., HOSSAIN BHUIYAN, J., An introduction to international human rights law, ed. Brill, The Hague, 2010.
  43. RANDALL, K.C., "Federal jurisdiction over international law claims: Inquiries into the Alien Tort Statute", in New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 18, 1985, pp. 1, 4-8.
  44. RATNER, S.R., The thin justice of international law: A moral reckoning of the law of Nations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015.
  45. RYNGAERT, C., Jurisdiction in international law, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015, pp. 85ss.
  46. SCALIA, A., A matter of interpretation. Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1997.
  47. SCHARF, M.P., NEWTON, M.A., STERIO, M., Prosecuting maritime piracy. Domestic solutions to international crimes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
  48. SHAFIR, H., MEADE, E., ACEVES, W.J., Lessons and legacies of the war on terror. From moral panic to permanent war, ed. Routledge, London & New York, 2013.
  49. SLOSS, D.L., RAMSEN, M.D., DODGE, W.S., International law in the U.S. Supreme Court, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.
  50. SOHN, L.B., "Torture as violation of the law of Nations", in Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 11, 1981, pp. 37ss.
  51. SOKOL, D.D., CHENG, T.K., LIANOS, I., Competition and the State, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2014.
  52. STEINARD, R.G., "Determining, which human rights claims "touch and concern" the United States: Justice Kennedy's Filartiga", in Notre Dame Law Review, 89 (4), 2014, pp. 1700ss.
  53. STEINHARDT, R.G., "Kiobel and the weakening of precedent: A long walk for a short drink", in American Journal of International Law (Agora: Reflections on Kiobel), 107, 2013, pp. 842ss.
  54. THAMAN, S.C., Exclusionary rules in comparative law, ed. Springer, Berlin, 2012, pp. 8ss.
  55. UZELAH, A., Transformation of civil justice: Unity and diversity, ed. Springer, Berlin, 2018, pp. 212ss.
  56. VÁZQUEZ, C.M., "Things we do with presumtpion: reflections on Kiobel v. Royal dutch petroleum", in Notre Dame Law Review, 89 (4), 2014, pp. 1722ss.
  57. VON ARNAULD, A., Völkerrecht, C.F. Müller, Heidelberg, 2016.
  58. VON GLAHN, G., TAULBEE, J.L., Law among Nations: An introduction to public international law, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2017.
  59. WALDBESER, D.F., "Terra ferma as open seas: Interpreting Kiobel in the failed State context", in Indiana Law Journal, 91 (4), 2016.
  60. WALLACH, D., "The irrationality of universal civil jurisdiction", in Georgetown Journal of International Law, 46, 2015, pp. 803ss.
  61. WETTEL, J.R.M., Human rights in transnational business. Translating human rights, ed. Springer, Berlin, 2016.
  62. WINKLER, M.M., "What remains of the alien tort statute after Kiobel", in North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, 39 (1), 2013, pp. 180ss.
  63. WUERTH, I., "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.: The Supreme Court and the Alien Tort Statute", in American Journal of International Law, 2013, pp. 601, 604ss.
  64. YOUNG, E.A., "Universal jurisdiction. The Alien Tort Statute and transnational public-law litigation after Kiobel", in Duke Law Journal, 64, 2015, pp. 1028ss.