Transplante de microbiota fecal no SUS: uma análise de impacto orçamentário

Authors

  • Tatiane Garcia do Carmo Flausino Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de São Carlos/HU Brasil, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5470-1919
  • Elene Paltrinieri Nardi Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4172-1049
  • Bárbara Martins Lima Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de São Carlos/HU Brasil, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7352-1283
  • Fábio Ricardo Carrasco Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de São Carlos/HU Brasil, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8997-9144
  • Gerhard da Paz Lauterbach Núcleo de Avaliação de Tecnologias em Saúde do Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de São Carlos/HU Brasil, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • Rosely Moralez de Figueiredo Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0131-4314
  • Daniela Oliveira de Melo Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-7953

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2026.v52.51592

Keywords:

Fecal microbiota transplantation, Clostridium infections, Clostridioides difficile, Analysis of the budgetary impact of therapeutic advances, . Technology assessment biomedical

Abstract

Introduction: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection is a significant cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea and is closely linked to antimicrobial use, with substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. In Brazil, the treatment of recurrent infections faces considerable limitations, as fidaxomicin is not available in the country. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the cost of colonoscopy-guided transplantation using fresh feces for the Unified Health System and to conduct a budget impact analysis regarding the incorporation of this transplantation for the treatment of recurrent infection. Methods: A budget impact analysis was conducted, considering the incorporation of fecal microbiota transplantation into the Unified Health System compared to the current treatment in Brazil, which includes metronidazole and vancomycin. Data on disease epidemiology and healthcare resource consumption were utilized. To estimate the transplantation cost, the Microcosting method was adopted. All parameters in the analysis were subject to variation concerning the point estimate, based on a deterministic univariate sensitivity analysis. Results: Over five years, an estimated savings of R$ 27,084.72 was observed in the scenario incorporating transplantation. The results were sensitive to variations in the cost of injectable metronidazole, transplantation cost, and recurrence after transplantation. Conclusion: The budget impact analysis demonstrated that incorporating transplantation for patients with recurrent C. difficile infection into the Unified Health System is feasible and may result in cost savings, contributing to the sustainability of the healthcare system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Donskey CJ. Update on Clostridioides difficile Infection in Older Adults. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2023; 37(1):87-102. DOI:10.1016/j.idc.2022.10.001.

2. Knight DR, Imwattana K, Collins DA, Lim SC, Hong S, Putsathit P, et al. Genomic epidemiology and transmission dynamics of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in Western Australia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 42(5):607-19. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04569-x.

3. Guery B, Galperine T, Barbut F. Clostridioides difficile: diagnosis and treatments. BMJ 2019; 366:l4609. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4609.

4. Braga DS, Oliveira DF, Lourenço NV, Carvalho GM, Rezende VMLR, Lourenço TV, et al. Incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection in a quaternary referral university hospital in Brazil. Anaerobe. 2023; 79:102672. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102672.

5. Maestri AC, Raboni SM, Morales HMP, Ferrari LF, Tuon FFB, Losso A, et al. Multicenter study of the epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection and recurrence in southern Brazil. Anaerobe. 2020; 64:102238. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102238.

6. Johnson S, Lavergne V, Skinner AM, Gonzales-Luna AJ, Garey KW, Kelly CP, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 73(5):e1029-44. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab549.

7. NICE (UK). Clostridioides difficile infection: antimicrobial prescribing. NICE guideline [Internet]. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [Internet]; 2021 [citado em 2025 dez. 19]. Disponível em: www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng199.

8. Souza GN, Porto MJ, Santos JP, Freitas AL, Carvalho PP. Perfil das prescrições de antimicrobianos de uso restrito em uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Res Soc Dev. 2021; 10(8):e15710816565. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v10i8.16565.

9. Knudsen MJS, Rubin IMC, Petersen AM. The Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Vancomycin for the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection – A Systematic Review. Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023; 15:63-71. DOI: 10.2147/dhps.s348501.

10. Alves JDF, Yamaguti A, de Mendonça JS, Gamba CM, Fonseca CL, Paraskevopoulos DKS, et al. Metronidazole for Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections in Brazil: A Single-Center Experience and Risk Factors for Mortality. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(9):1162. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11091162.

11. Oksi J, Anttila VJ, Mattila E. Treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection. Ann Med. 2020; 52(1-2):12-20. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2019.1701703.

12. Trindade CNR, Domingues RMCP, Ferreira EO. The epidemiology of Clostridioides difficile infection in Brazil: A systematic review covering thirty years. Anaerobe. 2019; 58:13-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.03.002.

13. Prefeitura de São Paulo (BR), Secretaria Municipal da Saúde. Prevenção contra as infecções relacionadas à assistência à saúde (IRAS) causadas por C. difficile [Internet]. São Paulo: Secretaria municipal de saúde; 2023 [citado em 2025 dez. 19]. Disponível em: https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/upload/saude/Notat%C3%A9cnica.pdf.

14. de Albuquerque Terra DA, Vilela EG, Silva ROS, Leão LA, Lima KS, Kuijper EJ, et al. Experience of the first Brazilian fecal microbiota transplantation center in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Microb Health Dis. 2022; 4:e806. DOI: 10.26355/mhd_202212_806.

15. Tang G, Yin W, Liu W. Is frozen fecal microbiota transplantation as effective as fresh fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection: A meta-analysis? Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017; 88(4):322-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.05.007.

16. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Diretrizes Metodológicas: Análise de Impacto Orçamentário: Manual para o Sistema de Saúde do Brasil [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012 [citado em 2025 dez. 19]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/conitec/pt-br/midias/artigos_publicacoes/diretrizes/diretrizes_metodologicas_analise_impacto-1.pdf/@@display-file/file.

17. Tariq R, Hayat M, Pardi D, Khanna S. Predictors of failure after fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(7):1383-92. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-021-04163-z.

18. Aby ES, Vaughn BP, Enns EA, Rajasingham R. Cost-effectiveness of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for First Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2022; 75(9):1602-9. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac207.

19. Lodise T, Guo A, Yang M, Cook EE, Song W, Yang D, et al. Budget Impact Analysis of REBYOTA™ (Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm [FMBL]) for Preventing Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in the US. Adv Ther. 2023; 40(6):2801-2819. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02506-0.

20. World Health Organization. 2023 Antibacterial agents in clinical and preclinical development: an overview and analysis [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024 [citado em 2025 dezembro.19]. Disponível em: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/376944/9789240094000-eng.pdf?sequence=1.

21. Presidência da República (BR). Decreto nº 11.715, de 26 de setembro de 2023: Institui a Estratégia Nacional para o Desenvolvimento do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde [Internet]. Brasília: Presidência da República; 2023 [citado em 2025 dez. 19]. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2023/decreto/d11715.htm#:~:text=DECRETO.

22. Brazier A, Merriam S, Halpern D. BSAC Vanguard Series: Behavioural science and antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022; 77(7):1793-5. DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac087.

23. Sakata RAP, Silva RC, Gales AC, Cuba GT, Pignatari ACC, Kiffer CRV. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial consumption trends and correlation with bacterial infections and antimicrobial resistance over 5 years. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022; 28:115-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.031.

24. Upadhayay A, Ling J, Pal D, Xie Y, Ping FF, Kumar A. Resistance-proof antimicrobial drug discovery to combat global antimicrobial resistance threat. Drug Resist Updat. 2023; 66:100890. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2022.100890.

25. Cammarota G, Ianiro G, Kelly CR, Mullish BH, Allegretti JR, Kassam Z, et al. International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2019; 68(12):2111-21. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319548.

Published

2026-10-13

How to Cite

1.
Flausino TG do C, Nardi EP, Lima BM, Carrasco FR, Lauterbach G da P, Figueiredo RM de, et al. Transplante de microbiota fecal no SUS: uma análise de impacto orçamentário. HU Rev [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 13 [cited 2026 Oct. 13];52:1-10. Available from: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/51592

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.