“School without party”

science and teaching between the dock and the inquisitorial bonfire

Abstract

The objective this study is to perform an analysis of the project "School without party" and its implications for science and teaching practice. Although it presents itself as exempt from and against ideology and parties, the research demonstrates that the project is only an ideology that takes the form of deideologization to better pass and meet the interests of certain subjects, groups and class. The results indicate that, in the person of the teacher, it is the very science that is accused, judged and convicted, placed between the dock (criminalized) and the inquisitorial bonfire (demoralized and anathemed). Hence the teacher is treated, concomitantly, as criminal, degenerate and, mainly, political, moral and sexual degenerate. Under the philosophical-scientific appearance of the neutrality and pluralism of the project, it hides nothing less than its (neo)obscurantist and autocratic character, subjecting the teaching-scientific practice to mere opinion.