Quantitative evaluation of palatal bone thickness to guide miniscrews insertion: a CBCT assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2020.v46.30877Palabras clave:
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Palate, Alveolar Process, Orthodontic Anchorage ProceduresResumen
Introduction: The use of mini-implants has become common in orthodontic practice as it has increased the possibility of skeletal anchorage. The palate constitutes a site of choice for the insertion of miniscrews purposes because it is a site with relatively safety with appropriate bone thickness and less suitability for inflammation. Aim: To quantitatively evaluate the thickness of the palatal bone for miniscrews insertion. Material and Methods: Forty-seven sets of cone beam computed tomographic (CBCT) images were selected. The sample consisted of cone beam computed tomography from 47 patients (20 male, 27 female; mean age 22.4 years old/± 3.01 years). Palatal bone thickness (PBT) was measured in millimeters (mm) with 5 regions of interest (ROIs) which were determined used the coronal reconstructions of the patatal area: 4, 6, 8 and 10 mm posterior to the incisive foramen were evaluated. A total of 940 ROIs were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed for PBT between various palatal sections (p<.01). The thickest area (6.31-7.03 mm) was found in the anterior part of the palate. The mean bone thicknesses in the 6, 8 and 10 mm sections were significantly less than those observed at 4 mm from the incisive foramen. Conclusions: The thickness of the palatal bone is progressively thinner from the palatine foramen to the posterior region. Transversally, the bone was thicker in the palatine suture than in paramedian areas, mainly in the coronal reconstructions located more laterally.
Descargas
Citas
Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative cone-beam compute tomography evaluation of palatal bone thickness for orthodontic miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008; 134:361-9.
Heymann GC, Tulloch JF. Implantable devices as orthodontic anchorage: a review of current treatment modalities. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006; 18:68-79.
Herman R, Cope JB. Miniscrew implants: IMTEC mini ortho implants. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11:32-9.
Maino BG, Mura P, Bednar J. Miniscrew implants: the spiderscrew anchorage system. Semin Orthod. 2005; 11:40-6.
Liou EJW, Pai BCJ, Lin JCY. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:42-7.
Lim HJ, Eun CS, Cho JH, Lee KH, Hwang HSl. Factors associated with initial stability of miniscrews for orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009; 136:236-42.
Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugawara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003; 124:373-78.
Tseng YC, Hsieh CH, Chen CH, Shen YS, Huang IY, Chen CM. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006; 35:704-7.
Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HH, Takano-Yamamoto T. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: success rate and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007; 131:9-15.
Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 130:18-25.
Morea C, Dominguez GC, Wuo AV, Tortamano A. Surgical guide for optimal positioning of mini implants. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 39:317-21.
Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl. 2004; 19:100-6.
Moon SH, Park SH, Lim WH, Chun YS. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80:137-44.
Gracco A, Lombardo L, Cozzani M, Siciliani G. Quantitative evaluation with CBCT of palatal bone thickness in growing patients. Progr Orthod. 2006; 2:164-74.
Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. Radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:832-7.
Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001; 12:79-84.
Lekholm U, Zahr GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Alberktsson T. Osseointegration in clinical dentstry. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 199-209.
Shahlaie M, Gantes B, Schulz E, Riggs M, Crigger M. Bone density assessment of dental bone sites: quantitative computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18:224-31.
Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:253-60.
Park HS, Lee YJ, Jeong SH, Kwon TG. Density of the alveolar and basal bone of the maxilla and the mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008; 133:30-7.
Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, Major PW. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:112-16.
Behnia H, Motamedian SR, Kiani MT, Morad G, Khojasteh A. Accuracy and reliability of cone beam computed tomographic measurements of the bone labial and palatal to the maxillary anterior teeth. The Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015; 30:1249-55.
Suttapreyasri S, Suapear P, Leepong N. The accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for evaluating bone density and cortical bone thickness at the implant site: micro-computed tomography and histologic analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29:2026-31.
Nackaerts O, Maes F, Yan H, Couto Souza P, Pauwels R, Jacobs R. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011; 22:873-9.
Bernhart T, Vollgruber A, Gahleitner A, Dortbudak O, Haas R. Alternative to median region of the palate for placement of an orthodontic implant. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2000; 11:595-601.
Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007; 131:S74-S81.
Aranyarachkul P, Caruso J, Gantes B et al. Bone density assessment of fental implant sites: 2. Quantitative Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005; 20:416-24.
Hua Y, Nackaerts O, Duyck J, Maes F, Jacobs R. Bone quality assessment based on cone-beam computed tomography imaging. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2009; 20:767-71.
Carano A, Velo S, Leone P, Siciliano G. Clinical implication of the miniscrew anchorage system. J Clin Orthod. 2005; 39:9-24.
Ravi B, Kamath G, Srikanth HS, Babshet M. Utility of cbct for the measurement of palatal bone thickness. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 119:196-8.
Ryu JH, Park JH, Thi Thu TV, Bayome M, Kim Y, Kook YA. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012; 142:207-12.
Manjula WS, Murali RV, Kumar SK, Tajir F, Mahalakshmi K. Palatal bone thickness measured by palatal index method using cone-beam computed tomography in nonorthodontic patients for placement of mini-implants. Dental Science. 2015; 7:107-10.
Hourfar J, Kanavakis G, Bister D, Schätzle M, Awad L, Nienkemper M, Goldbecher C, Ludwig B. Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants: a cone-beam CT study. Eur J Orthod. 2015; 37(6):589-95.
Holm M, Jost-Brinkmann PG, Mah J, Bumann A. Bone thickness of the anterior palate for orthodontic miniscrews. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86:826-31.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Cessão de Primeira Publicação à HU Revista
Os autores mantém todos os direitos autorais sobre a publicação, sem restrições, e concedem à HU Revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento irrestrito do trabalho, com reconhecimento da autoria e crédito pela citação de publicação inicial nesta revista, referenciando inclusive seu DOI.
