Uma atualização sobre biomateriais em implantodontia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2018.v44.13949Palavras-chave:
Substitutos ósseos, Implante, Regeneração ósseaResumo
O processo alveolar é uma estrutura dente dependente que sofre alterações dimensionais após a exodontia. Defeitos ósseos resultantes prejudicam a colocação de implantes e o sucesso em longo prazo. Diversas técnicas cirúrgicas e biomateriais tem sido apresentados como opções terapêuticas para preservação e recuperação dos rebordos edêntulos. Assim, o objetivo desta revisão narrativa é evidenciar o estado atual dos biomateriais disponíveis bem como as possíveis perspectivas futuras. A utilização de biomateriais para cirurgias de reconstrução e manutenção de rebordo alveolar com sucesso é evidente. A impressão em 3D de estruturas biocompatíveis, fatores de crescimento, as DDMs, parafusos e membranas reabsorvíveis podem ser as perspectivas futuras.Downloads
Referências
AGHALOO, T. et al. Bone Augmentation of the Edentulous Maxilla for Implant Placement: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, [s. l.], v. 31, n. suppl, p. 19–30, 2016.
AL RUHAIMI, K. A. Bone Graft Substitutes: A Comparative Qualitative Histologic Review of Current Osteoconductive Grafting Materials. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 105–114, 2001.
ALKUDMANI, H.; JASSER, R. A. L.; ANDREANA, S. Is bone graft or guided bone regeneration needed when placing immediate dental implants? A systematic review. Implant Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 6, p. 936–944, 2017.
ARAÚJO, M. G.; LINDHE, J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 2, p. 212–218, 2005.
ARTAS, G. et al. A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration. Brazilian Oral Research, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 0, p. 1–8, 2018.
BAE, J. C. et al. Development and assessment of a 3D-printed scaffold with rhBMP-2 for an implant surgical guide stent and bone graft material: A pilot animal study. Materials, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 12, 2017.
BARBU, H. M. et al. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation to Enable One-Stage Implant Placement by Using Bovine Bone Substitute and Platelet-Rich Fibrin. BioMed Research International, [s. l.], v. 2018, 2018.
BARTOLS, A. et al. Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with autogenous block grafts fixed at a distance versus resorbable Poly-D-L-Lactide foil fixed at a distance: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 8, p. 843–854, 2018.
BENIC, G.; HÄMMERLE, C. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontology 2000, [s. l.], v. 66, n. 1, p. 13–40, 2014.
BENIC, G. I. et al. Primary ridge augmentation with collagenated xenogenic block bone substitute in combination with collagen membrane and rhBMP-2: a pilot histological investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 12, p. 1543–1552, 2017.
CHA, J. K. et al. Osteogenic efficacy of BMP-2 mixed with hydrogel and bone substitute in peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs: 16 weeks of healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 3, p. 300–308, 2018.
CHAPPUIS, V.; ARAÚJO, M. G.; BUSER, D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology 2000, [s. l.], v. 73, n. 1, p. 73–83, 2017.
CHEN, P. et al. Fabrication of a silver nanoparticle-coated collagen membrane with anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory activities for guided bone regeneration. Biomedical Materials, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 6, p. 065014, 2018.
CHIAPASCO, M. et al. Dental implants placed in severely atrophic jaws reconstructed with autogenous calvarium, bovine bone mineral, and collagen membranes: A 3- to 19-year retrospective follow-up study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 7, p. 725–740, 2018.
CHIAPASCO, M.; CASENTINI, P.; ZANIBONI, M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, [s. l.], v. 24 Suppl, n. 1, p. 237–259, 2009.
CHIAPASCO, M.; ZANIBONI, M.; BOISCO, M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 17, n. SUPPL. 2, p. 136–159, 2006.
CORNING, P.; MEALEY, B. Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft compared to mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft . A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol, [s. l.], v. 30, n. March, 2018. [Epub ahead of print]
COSYN, J.; CLEYMAET, R.; DE BRUYN, H. Predictors of Alveolar Process Remodeling Following Ridge Preservation in High-Risk Patients. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 226–233, 2016.
DE SOUSA, C. A. et al. Bone augmentation using autogenous bone versus biomaterial in the posterior region of atrophic mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 76, n. March, p. 1–8, 2018.
ELGALI, I. et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. European Journal of Oral Sciences, [s. l.], v. 125, n. 5, p. 315–337, 2017.
ESPOSITO, M. et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, [s. l.], n. 3, 2009.
EZIRGANLI, Ş. et al. Comparative investigation of the effects of different materials used with a titanium barrier on new bone formation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 312–319, 2013.
GLAUSER, R. et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: A prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 204–213, 2001.
JENSEN, O. T. et al. Orthognathic and Osteoperiosteal Flap Augmentation Strategies for Maxillary Dental Implant Reconstruction. Dental Clinics of North America, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 4, p. 813–846, 2011.
JENSEN, S. S.; TERHEYDEN, D. D. S. H. Bone Augmentation Procedures in Localized Defects in the Alveolar Ridge : Clinical Results with Different Bone Grafts and Bone-Substitute Materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, [s. l.], v. 24, n. suppl, p. 218–36, 2009.
KARAGEORGIOU, V.; KAPLAN, D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 27, p. 5474–5491, 2005.
KIM, B. S. et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix: A step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing. Biofabrication, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 3, 2017.
KIM, Y. K. et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, [s. l.], v. 109, n. 4, p. 496–503, 2010.
KIM, Y. K. et al. Guided Bone Regeneration Using Demineralized Dentin Matrix: Long-Term Follow-Up. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 3, p. 515e1-515e9, 2016.
LEE, D. J. et al. Patient Perception and Satisfaction with Implant Therapy in a Predoctoral Implant Education Program: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Prosthodontics, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 7, p. 525–531, 2015.
LI, P.; ZHU, H.; HUANG, D. Autogenous DDM versus Bio-Oss granules in GBR for immediate implantation in periodontal postextraction sites: A prospective clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], n. May, p. 1–6, 2018.
MENEZES, J. D. et al. Bioactive glass added to autogenous bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a prospective histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and bone graft resorption assessment. Journal of Applied Oral Science, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 0, p. 1–9, 2018.
OCAK, H. et al. Comparison of Bovine Bone-Autogenic Bone Mixture Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Maxillary Sinus Grafting: Histologic and Histomorphologic Study. Journal of Oral Implantology, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 3, p. 194–201, 2017.
PJETURSSON, B. E. et al. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients’ perception. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 7, p. 667–676, 2009.
SCHWARTZ-ARAD, D. et al. Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 449–461, 2016.
STOPA, Z. et al. Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Allogeneic Bone Grafts in the Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible. Transplantation Proceedings, [s. l.], v. 50, n. 7, p. 2199–2201, 2018.
TAN, W. L. et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 23, n. SUPPL. 5, p. 1–21, 2012.
URBAN, I. et al. Horizontal guided bone regeneration in the posterior maxilla using recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 421–5, 2013.
YAMADA, M.; EGUSA, H. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 152–161, 2018.
Downloads
Arquivos adicionais
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Cessão de Primeira Publicação à HU Revista
Os autores mantém todos os direitos autorais sobre a publicação, sem restrições, e concedem à HU Revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento irrestrito do trabalho, com reconhecimento da autoria e crédito pela citação de publicação inicial nesta revista, referenciando inclusive seu DOI.
