Uma atualização sobre biomateriais em implantodontia

Autores

  • Thaís Izidoro Pires
  • Adriana Araújo de Oliveira Paiva
  • Cleide Gisele Ribeiro
  • Matheus Furtado de Carvalho
  • Eduardo Machado Vilela
  • Breno Nogueira-Silva
  • Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8612-5044

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2018.v44.13949

Palavras-chave:

Substitutos ósseos, Implante, Regeneração óssea

Resumo

O processo alveolar é uma estrutura dente dependente que sofre alterações dimensionais após a exodontia. Defeitos ósseos resultantes prejudicam a colocação de implantes e o sucesso em longo prazo. Diversas técnicas cirúrgicas e biomateriais tem sido apresentados como opções terapêuticas para preservação e recuperação dos rebordos edêntulos. Assim, o objetivo desta revisão narrativa é evidenciar o estado atual dos biomateriais disponíveis bem como as possíveis perspectivas futuras. A utilização de biomateriais para cirurgias de reconstrução e manutenção de rebordo alveolar com sucesso é evidente. A impressão em 3D de estruturas biocompatíveis, fatores de crescimento, as DDMs, parafusos e membranas reabsorvíveis podem ser as perspectivas futuras.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

possui graduação em Odontologia pela Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (1981), mestrado em Odontologia Restauradora pela Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho (2001) e doutorado em Odontologia Restauradora pela Universidade Estadual Paulista (2003). Atualmente é professora adjunta Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. Tem experiência na área de Odontologia, com ênfase em Cirurgia e Implantodontia, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: exodontia, regeneração alveolar, implantes dentários, enxertos ósseos

Referências

AGHALOO, T. et al. Bone Augmentation of the Edentulous Maxilla for Implant Placement: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, [s. l.], v. 31, n. suppl, p. 19–30, 2016.

AL RUHAIMI, K. A. Bone Graft Substitutes: A Comparative Qualitative Histologic Review of Current Osteoconductive Grafting Materials. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 1, p. 105–114, 2001.

ALKUDMANI, H.; JASSER, R. A. L.; ANDREANA, S. Is bone graft or guided bone regeneration needed when placing immediate dental implants? A systematic review. Implant Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 6, p. 936–944, 2017.

ARAÚJO, M. G.; LINDHE, J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 2, p. 212–218, 2005.

ARTAS, G. et al. A comparison of different bone graft materials in peri-implant guided bone regeneration. Brazilian Oral Research, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 0, p. 1–8, 2018.

BAE, J. C. et al. Development and assessment of a 3D-printed scaffold with rhBMP-2 for an implant surgical guide stent and bone graft material: A pilot animal study. Materials, [s. l.], v. 10, n. 12, 2017.

BARBU, H. M. et al. Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation to Enable One-Stage Implant Placement by Using Bovine Bone Substitute and Platelet-Rich Fibrin. BioMed Research International, [s. l.], v. 2018, 2018.

BARTOLS, A. et al. Lateral alveolar ridge augmentation with autogenous block grafts fixed at a distance versus resorbable Poly-D-L-Lactide foil fixed at a distance: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 8, p. 843–854, 2018.

BENIC, G.; HÄMMERLE, C. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontology 2000, [s. l.], v. 66, n. 1, p. 13–40, 2014.

BENIC, G. I. et al. Primary ridge augmentation with collagenated xenogenic block bone substitute in combination with collagen membrane and rhBMP-2: a pilot histological investigation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 12, p. 1543–1552, 2017.

CHA, J. K. et al. Osteogenic efficacy of BMP-2 mixed with hydrogel and bone substitute in peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs: 16 weeks of healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 3, p. 300–308, 2018.

CHAPPUIS, V.; ARAÚJO, M. G.; BUSER, D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontology 2000, [s. l.], v. 73, n. 1, p. 73–83, 2017.

CHEN, P. et al. Fabrication of a silver nanoparticle-coated collagen membrane with anti-bacterial and anti-inflammatory activities for guided bone regeneration. Biomedical Materials, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 6, p. 065014, 2018.

CHIAPASCO, M. et al. Dental implants placed in severely atrophic jaws reconstructed with autogenous calvarium, bovine bone mineral, and collagen membranes: A 3- to 19-year retrospective follow-up study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 7, p. 725–740, 2018.

CHIAPASCO, M.; CASENTINI, P.; ZANIBONI, M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, [s. l.], v. 24 Suppl, n. 1, p. 237–259, 2009.

CHIAPASCO, M.; ZANIBONI, M.; BOISCO, M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 17, n. SUPPL. 2, p. 136–159, 2006.

CORNING, P.; MEALEY, B. Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft compared to mineralized solvent-dehydrated bone allograft . A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol, [s. l.], v. 30, n. March, 2018. [Epub ahead of print]

COSYN, J.; CLEYMAET, R.; DE BRUYN, H. Predictors of Alveolar Process Remodeling Following Ridge Preservation in High-Risk Patients. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 226–233, 2016.

DE SOUSA, C. A. et al. Bone augmentation using autogenous bone versus biomaterial in the posterior region of atrophic mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, [s. l.], v. 76, n. March, p. 1–8, 2018.

ELGALI, I. et al. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. European Journal of Oral Sciences, [s. l.], v. 125, n. 5, p. 315–337, 2017.

ESPOSITO, M. et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, [s. l.], n. 3, 2009.

EZIRGANLI, Ş. et al. Comparative investigation of the effects of different materials used with a titanium barrier on new bone formation. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 3, p. 312–319, 2013.

GLAUSER, R. et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark implants applied in various jawbone regions: A prospective, 1-year clinical study. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 204–213, 2001.

JENSEN, O. T. et al. Orthognathic and Osteoperiosteal Flap Augmentation Strategies for Maxillary Dental Implant Reconstruction. Dental Clinics of North America, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 4, p. 813–846, 2011.

JENSEN, S. S.; TERHEYDEN, D. D. S. H. Bone Augmentation Procedures in Localized Defects in the Alveolar Ridge : Clinical Results with Different Bone Grafts and Bone-Substitute Materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, [s. l.], v. 24, n. suppl, p. 218–36, 2009.

KARAGEORGIOU, V.; KAPLAN, D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 27, p. 5474–5491, 2005.

KIM, B. S. et al. Decellularized extracellular matrix: A step towards the next generation source for bioink manufacturing. Biofabrication, [s. l.], v. 9, n. 3, 2017.

KIM, Y. K. et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, [s. l.], v. 109, n. 4, p. 496–503, 2010.

KIM, Y. K. et al. Guided Bone Regeneration Using Demineralized Dentin Matrix: Long-Term Follow-Up. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, [s. l.], v. 74, n. 3, p. 515e1-515e9, 2016.

LEE, D. J. et al. Patient Perception and Satisfaction with Implant Therapy in a Predoctoral Implant Education Program: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Prosthodontics, [s. l.], v. 24, n. 7, p. 525–531, 2015.

LI, P.; ZHU, H.; HUANG, D. Autogenous DDM versus Bio-Oss granules in GBR for immediate implantation in periodontal postextraction sites: A prospective clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], n. May, p. 1–6, 2018.

MENEZES, J. D. et al. Bioactive glass added to autogenous bone graft in maxillary sinus augmentation: a prospective histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and bone graft resorption assessment. Journal of Applied Oral Science, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 0, p. 1–9, 2018.

OCAK, H. et al. Comparison of Bovine Bone-Autogenic Bone Mixture Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Maxillary Sinus Grafting: Histologic and Histomorphologic Study. Journal of Oral Implantology, [s. l.], v. 43, n. 3, p. 194–201, 2017.

PJETURSSON, B. E. et al. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients’ perception. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 7, p. 667–676, 2009.

SCHWARTZ-ARAD, D. et al. Long Term Follow-Up of Dental Implants Placed in Autologous Onlay Bone Graft. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 449–461, 2016.

STOPA, Z. et al. Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Efficacy of Allogeneic Bone Grafts in the Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible. Transplantation Proceedings, [s. l.], v. 50, n. 7, p. 2199–2201, 2018.

TAN, W. L. et al. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research, [s. l.], v. 23, n. SUPPL. 5, p. 1–21, 2012.

URBAN, I. et al. Horizontal guided bone regeneration in the posterior maxilla using recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, [s. l.], v. 33, n. 4, p. 421–5, 2013.

YAMADA, M.; EGUSA, H. Current bone substitutes for implant dentistry. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, [s. l.], v. 62, n. 2, p. 152–161, 2018.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-02-08

Como Citar

1.
Pires TI, Paiva AA de O, Ribeiro CG, de Carvalho MF, Vilela EM, Nogueira-Silva B, Assis NMSP. Uma atualização sobre biomateriais em implantodontia. hu rev [Internet]. 8º de fevereiro de 2019 [citado 16º de agosto de 2022];44(1):41-7. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/13949

Edição

Seção

Artigos de Revisão da Literatura

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

Artigos Semelhantes

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.