Intertextualidade e o cânone retórico

Autores

  • Richard Joseph Schoeck

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/2318-3446.2017.v5.23208

Palavras-chave:

Arte literária, crítica, intertextualidade, cânone, retórica

Resumo

Este artigo parte de uma história etimológica dos termos "retórica" e "cânone" para abordar a interdependência de métodos e meios entre a arte literária (produção e crítica) e o tradicional sistema retórico que esteve na base da educação europeia desde a Antiguidade. A intertextualidade é reconhecida como uma "constante literária universal", e são apontados os modos pelos quais o ensino formal teve um papel central na validação do cânone literário na Idade Média e no Renascimento. Ao final, apontam-se caminhos para avaliar, decodificar e relativizar a tradição retórica no contexto da crítica moderna, ressaltando que o processo de desconstrução não deve implicar o desmantelamento das estruturas, mas uma consciente manifestação de cada uma delas.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ALLEN, D. C. Mysteriously Meant: The Rediscovery of Pagan Symbolism and Allegorical interpretation in the Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1970.

BALDWIN, T. W. William Shakespeare's Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944. 2 v.

BARON, H. Humanistic and Political Literature in Florence and Venice at the Beginning of the Quattrocento. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1955a.

______. The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Liberty in an Age of Classicism and Tyrany. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1955b. 2 v.

BATE, W. J. The Burden of the Past and the English Poet. Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1970.

BUSH, D. Mythology and the Renaissance Tradition in English Poetry. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1932.

ELYOT, S. T. The Book Named The Governor. Londres: Dent, 1907.

ERASMO. The Collected Works of Erasmo. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.

FUMAROLI, M. L’Âge de l'éloquence : Rhetorique et 'res literaria' de la Renaissance au seuil de l'époque classique. Geneva: Droz, 1980.

GORDAN, P. W. G. Pro Renaissance Book Hunters: The Letters of Poggius Bracciolini to Nicolaus de Niccolis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1974.

GREENE, T. M. The Light in Troy: Imitation and Discovery in Renaissance Poetry. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982.

HENDERSON, J. R. Erasmus on the Art of Letter Writing. In: MURPHY, J. J. (Org.). Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.

HOFSTADTER, D. R. Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid New York: Vintage Book, 1979.

JUNG, C. G.; KERÉNYI, K. Essays on a Science of Mythology. New York: Pantheon, 1948, passim — com referências fornecidas por eles.

KENNEDY, G. A. Classical Rhetoric and Its Christian and Secular Tradition from Ancient to Modern Times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1980.

KERMODE, F. The Genesis of Secrecy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976.

KLEIN, R. In: Formand Meaning: Essays on the Renaissance and Modern Art.. New York: Viking Press, 1979.

KRISTELLER, P. O. Renaissance Thought and Its Sources. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.

LARUSSO, D. A. Rhetoric in the Italian Renaissance. In: MURPHY, J. J. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.

MAN, P. de. Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1971.

MCFARLAND, T. Literature and Philosophy. In: BARRICELLI, J.-P. (Org.). Interrelations of Literature. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 1982.

MILLER, J. H. Stevens' Rock and Criticism as Cure, II. Georgia Review, v. 30, 1976.

MOSS, J. (Org.) Rhetoric and Praxis. New York: Catholic University of America Press, 1986.

MURPHY, J. J. Renaissance Rhetoric: A Short-Title Catalogue. New York: Garland, 1981.

_______. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983.

POCOCK, J. G. A. Politics, Language, and Time. New York: Atheneum, 1971.

SCHANZ, H. Problems and Trends in the History or German Rhetoric to 1500. In: MURPHY, J. J. Renaissance Eloquence: Studies in the Theory and Practice of Renaissance Rhetoric. Berkeley: University of Calilfornia Press, 1983.

SCHOECK, R. J. On Rhetoric in Fourteenth-Century Oxford. Medieval Studies, Toronto, v. 30, 1968.

______. The Achievement of Thomas More. Victoria: University of Victoria, 1976.

______. Review of Murphy’s Renaissance Rhetoric: A Short-Title Catalogue, in English Language Notes, v. 21, 1981.

VICKERS, B. (Org.). Rhetoric Revalued: Papers from the International Society for the History of Rhetoric. Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, Arizona: Arizona State University, 1982.

______. Lighting a Candle to the Place: On the Dimensions and Implications of Imitatio in the Renaissance. Italian Culture, Abingdon, v. 4, 1983.

______. Modern European Intellectual History. Denver Quarterly Review, Denver, v. 19, 1984.

VINSAUF, G. de. Poetria Nova. Trad. Margaret Nims. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1967, p. 16-17.

WILLIAMS, R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976.

Downloads

Publicado

2017-07-10

Como Citar

SCHOECK, R. J. Intertextualidade e o cânone retórico. Rónai – Revista de Estudos Clássicos e Tradutórios, [S. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p. 3–15, 2017. DOI: 10.34019/2318-3446.2017.v5.23208. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/ronai/article/view/23208. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2024.

Edição

Seção

Artigos