Tarea de compatibilidad espacial afectiva como modelo para el estudio del comportamiento emocional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-1247.2020.v14.30375Resumen
Además de los aspectos emocionales, el comportamiento humano puede verse afectado por otros factores, como la ubicación espacial de los estímulos, que favorecen la aparición de respuestas motoras más rápidas al estímulo en el mismo lado en una tarea de compatibilidad estímulorespuesta. Este artículo consiste en una revisión narrativa de estudios que utilizaron la Tarea compatibilidad espacial afectiva (TCEA) para evaluar la influencia de la valencia afectiva del estímulo en los patrones de compatibilidad espacial. En general, los estudios analizados indican que las figuras, imágenes y palabras con valencia emocional son capaces de influir en el comportamiento del sujeto. TCEA es una herramienta con potencial aplicación para el estudio de la interacción entre emoción y cognición en la evaluación neuropsicológica.
Descargas
Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Citas
Ambrosecchia, M., Marino, B., Gawryszewski, L., & Riggio, L. (2015). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00283
Anzola, G. P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15(2), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(77)90038-0
Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0090-9
Campbell, B.A., Gwendolyn, W., McBride, T. (1997). Origins of orienting and defensive responses: an evolutionary perspective. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M, editors. Attention and orienting. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Cavallet, M., Chaim-Avancini, T. M., Biazoli, C. E., Bazán, P. R., da Silva, M. A., Cunha, P. J., Miguel, C. S., Busatto, G. F., Louzã, M. R., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2016). Influence of emotional stimulus valence on inhibitory control in adults with and without ADHD. Experimental Brain Research, 234(11), 3213–3223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4719-0
Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007
Conde, E. Q., Cavallet, M., Torro-Alves, N., Matsushima, E. H., Fraga-Filho, R. S., Jazenko, F., Busatto, G., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2014a). Effects of affective valence on a mixed Spatial Correspondence Task: A reply to Proctor (2013). Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2014.021
Conde, E. F. Q., Matsushima, E. H., Torro-Alves, N., Cavallet, M., Jazenko, F., Fraga Filho, R. S., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2014b). Affective spatial compatibility task (AFFSCT): Theory and applications. Temas Em Psicologia, 22(3), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2014.3-08
Conde, E. F. Q., Jazenko, F., Fraga Filho, R. S., da Costa, D. H., Torro-Alves, N., Cavallet, M., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2011). Stimulus affective valence reverses spatial compatibility effect. Psychology & Neuroscience, 4(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2011.1.010
Davidson, Richard J. (2003). Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: Toward a synthesis. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00067
Davidson, R. J., Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Henriques, J. B. (1990). Asymmetrical brain electrical activity discriminates between psychometrically-matched verbal and spatial cognitive tasks. Psychophysiology, 27(5), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01970.x
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076358
Dolcos, F., Iordan, A. D., & Dolcos, S. (2011). Neural correlates of emotion-cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove, England), 23(6), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.594433
Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13(6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00490
Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
Filho, R., Lameira, A., Rangel, M. L., Oliveira, F., & Gawryszewski, L. (2018). Modulações dos efeitos Simon e Stroop espacial por tarefas prévias de compatibilidade espacial. Psico, 49, 242. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2018.3.26812
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062827
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions (p. xii, 544). Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Gawryszewski, L. de G., Lameira, A. P., Ferreira, F. M., Guimaraes-Silva, S., Conde, E. F. Q., & Pereira Jr., A. (2006). A compatibilidade estímulo-resposta como modelo para o estudo do comportamento motor. Psicologia USP, 17(4), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65642006000400006
Heister, G., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1994). Spatial S-R compatibility: Positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction. Acta Psychologica, 85(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90017-5
Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004
Jones, N. A., & Fox, N. A. (1992). Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity. Brain and Cognition, 20(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90021-D
Konopacki, M., & Ferreira, R. (2019). Política de oposição: Influência e informação nas eleições de 2018. http://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/xmlui/handle/bdtse/5551
Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Approach Does Not Equal Approach: Angry Facial Expressions Evoke Approach Only When It Serves Aggression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612471060
Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 810–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903047298
LeDoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4–5), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025048802629
Liu, W., Miller, B. L., Kramer, J. H., Rankin, K., Wyss-Coray, C., Gearhart, R., Phengrasamy, L., Weiner, M., & Rosen, H. J. (2004). Behavioral disorders in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 62(5), 742. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000113729.77161.C9
Lu, C., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959
Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2016). Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition: Psychological Science. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Arning, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(3), 325–336.
Nascimento, P. F. D. do, Lameira, A. P., Torro, N., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2020). Affective valence, spatial compatibility, and presidential candidates: A study on political rivalry in Brazilian elections. Psychology & Neuroscience, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000199
Pereira, M. G., Oliveira, L., Erthal, F., Joffily, M., Mocaiber, I. F., Volchan, E., & Pessoa, L. (2010). Emotion affects action: Midcingulate cortex as a pivotal node of interaction between negative emotion and motor signals. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 10(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.1.94
Pereira, M. G., Volchan, E., de Souza, G. G. L., Oliveira, L., Campagnoli, R. R., Pinheiro, W. M., & Pessoa, L. (2006). Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 6(4), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.622
Pereira, M. G., Volchan, E., Oliveira, L., Machado-Pinheiro, W., Rodrigues, J. A., Nepomuceno, F. V. P., & Pessoa, L. (2004). Behavioral modulation by mutilation pictures in women. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2004000300011
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 9(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317
Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00214-8
Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378
Proctor, R. W. (2013). Stimulus affect valence may influence mapping-rule selection but does not reverse the spatial compatibility effect: Reinterpretation of Conde et al. (2011). Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2013.1.02
Proctor, R. W. & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203022795
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
Root, J. C., Wong, P. S., & Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Left hemisphere specialization for response to positive emotional expressions: A divided output methodology. Emotion, 6(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.473
Simon, J. R., & Wolf, J. D. (1963). Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136308930679
Simon, J. Richard. (1967). Ear Preference in a Simple Reaction-Time Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021281
Tamietto, M., & de Gelder, B. (2010). Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(10), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2889
Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.131
Umiltá, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (p. 89–116). North-Holland.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vicente, J. G., & Azevedo, M. L. de. (2018). JORNADAS DE JUNHO: POLARIZAÇÃO, FANATISMO E AS MUDANÇAS NO CENÁRIO POLÍTICO NO BRASIL. Khóra: Revista Transdisciplinar, 5(6), Article 6. http://site.feuc.br/khora/index.php/vol/article/view/138
Yamaguchi, M., & Chen, J. (2019). Affective influences without approach-avoidance actions: On the congruence between valence and stimulus-response mappings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1547-1
Yamaguchi, M., Chen, J., Mishler, S., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: Does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses? Cognition & Emotion, 32(5), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1381073
Zhang, Y., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Influence of intermixed emotion-relevant trials on the affective Simon effect. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.409
Anzola, G. P., Bertoloni, G., Buchtel, H. A., & Rizzolatti, G. (1977). Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time. Neuropsychologia, 15(2), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(77)90038-0
Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66(3), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0090-9
Campbell, B.A., Gwendolyn, W., McBride, T. (1997). Origins of orienting and defensive responses: an evolutionary perspective. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M, editors. Attention and orienting. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Cavallet, M., Chaim-Avancini, T. M., Biazoli, C. E., Bazán, P. R., da Silva, M. A., Cunha, P. J., Miguel, C. S., Busatto, G. F., Louzã, M. R., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2016). Influence of emotional stimulus valence on inhibitory control in adults with and without ADHD. Experimental Brain Research, 234(11), 3213–3223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-016-4719-0
Centerbar, D. B., & Clore, G. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes? Psychological Science, 17(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01660.x
Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025002007
Conde, E. Q., Cavallet, M., Torro-Alves, N., Matsushima, E. H., Fraga-Filho, R. S., Jazenko, F., Busatto, G., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2014a). Effects of affective valence on a mixed Spatial Correspondence Task: A reply to Proctor (2013). Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2014.021
Conde, E. F. Q., Matsushima, E. H., Torro-Alves, N., Cavallet, M., Jazenko, F., Fraga Filho, R. S., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2014b). Affective spatial compatibility task (AFFSCT): Theory and applications. Temas Em Psicologia, 22(3), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2014.3-08
Conde, E. F. Q., Jazenko, F., Fraga Filho, R. S., da Costa, D. H., Torro-Alves, N., Cavallet, M., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2011). Stimulus affective valence reverses spatial compatibility effect. Psychology & Neuroscience, 4(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2011.1.010
Davidson, Richard J. (2003). Affective neuroscience and psychophysiology: Toward a synthesis. Psychophysiology, 40(5), 655–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00067
Davidson, R. J., Chapman, J. P., Chapman, L. J., & Henriques, J. B. (1990). Asymmetrical brain electrical activity discriminates between psychometrically-matched verbal and spatial cognitive tasks. Psychophysiology, 27(5), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1990.tb01970.x
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
Dolan, R. J. (2002). Emotion, Cognition, and Behavior. Science, 298(5596), 1191–1194. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1076358
Dolcos, F., Iordan, A. D., & Dolcos, S. (2011). Neural correlates of emotion-cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove, England), 23(6), 669–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.594433
Duckworth, K. L., Bargh, J. A., Garcia, M., & Chaiken, S. (2002). The automatic evaluation of novel stimuli. Psychological Science, 13(6), 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00490
Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2008). When do motor behaviors (mis)match affective stimuli? An evaluative coding view of approach and avoidance reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.262
Filho, R., Lameira, A., Rangel, M. L., Oliveira, F., & Gawryszewski, L. (2018). Modulações dos efeitos Simon e Stroop espacial por tarefas prévias de compatibilidade espacial. Psico, 49, 242. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2018.3.26812
Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062827
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions (p. xii, 544). Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Gawryszewski, L. de G., Lameira, A. P., Ferreira, F. M., Guimaraes-Silva, S., Conde, E. F. Q., & Pereira Jr., A. (2006). A compatibilidade estímulo-resposta como modelo para o estudo do comportamento motor. Psicologia USP, 17(4), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65642006000400006
Heister, G., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1994). Spatial S-R compatibility: Positional instruction vs. compatibility instruction. Acta Psychologica, 85(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)90017-5
Hommel, B. (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004
Jones, N. A., & Fox, N. A. (1992). Electroencephalogram asymmetry during emotionally evocative films and its relation to positive and negative affectivity. Brain and Cognition, 20(2), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(92)90021-D
Konopacki, M., & Ferreira, R. (2019). Política de oposição: Influência e informação nas eleições de 2018. http://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/xmlui/handle/bdtse/5551
Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2013). Approach Does Not Equal Approach: Angry Facial Expressions Evoke Approach Only When It Serves Aggression. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612471060
Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 810–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903047298
LeDoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23(4–5), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025048802629
Liu, W., Miller, B. L., Kramer, J. H., Rankin, K., Wyss-Coray, C., Gearhart, R., Phengrasamy, L., Weiner, M., & Rosen, H. J. (2004). Behavioral disorders in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 62(5), 742. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000113729.77161.C9
Lu, C., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(2), 174–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210959
Markman, A. B., & Brendl, C. M. (2016). Constraining Theories of Embodied Cognition: Psychological Science. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00772.x
Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., Arning, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes. The American Journal of Psychology, 122(3), 325–336.
Nascimento, P. F. D. do, Lameira, A. P., Torro, N., & Gawryszewski, L. G. (2020). Affective valence, spatial compatibility, and presidential candidates: A study on political rivalry in Brazilian elections. Psychology & Neuroscience, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000199
Pereira, M. G., Oliveira, L., Erthal, F., Joffily, M., Mocaiber, I. F., Volchan, E., & Pessoa, L. (2010). Emotion affects action: Midcingulate cortex as a pivotal node of interaction between negative emotion and motor signals. Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 10(1), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.10.1.94
Pereira, M. G., Volchan, E., de Souza, G. G. L., Oliveira, L., Campagnoli, R. R., Pinheiro, W. M., & Pessoa, L. (2006). Sustained and transient modulation of performance induced by emotional picture viewing. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 6(4), 622–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.622
Pereira, M. G., Volchan, E., Oliveira, L., Machado-Pinheiro, W., Rodrigues, J. A., Nepomuceno, F. V. P., & Pessoa, L. (2004). Behavioral modulation by mutilation pictures in women. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 37(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2004000300011
Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 9(2), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2317
Pessoa, L., Kastner, S., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neural and emotional stimuli. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00214-8
Phaf, R. H., Mohr, S. E., Rotteveel, M., & Wicherts, J. M. (2014). Approach, avoidance, and affect: A meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378
Proctor, R. W. (2013). Stimulus affect valence may influence mapping-rule selection but does not reverse the spatial compatibility effect: Reinterpretation of Conde et al. (2011). Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.3922/j.psns.2013.1.02
Proctor, R. W. & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-Response Compatibility Principles: Data, Theory, and Application. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203022795
Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.446
Root, J. C., Wong, P. S., & Kinsbourne, M. (2006). Left hemisphere specialization for response to positive emotional expressions: A divided output methodology. Emotion, 6(3), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.473
Simon, J. R., & Wolf, J. D. (1963). Choice reaction time as a function of angular stimulus-response correspondence and age. Ergonomics, 6(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140136308930679
Simon, J. Richard. (1967). Ear Preference in a Simple Reaction-Time Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021281
Tamietto, M., & de Gelder, B. (2010). Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(10), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2889
Tsal, Y., & Lavie, N. (1993). Location dominance in attending to color and shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.1.131
Umiltá, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1990). Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (p. 89–116). North-Holland.
Umiltà, C., & Nicoletti, R. (1985). Attention and coding effects in S-R compatibility due to irrelevant spatial cues. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 457–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vicente, J. G., & Azevedo, M. L. de. (2018). JORNADAS DE JUNHO: POLARIZAÇÃO, FANATISMO E AS MUDANÇAS NO CENÁRIO POLÍTICO NO BRASIL. Khóra: Revista Transdisciplinar, 5(6), Article 6. http://site.feuc.br/khora/index.php/vol/article/view/138
Yamaguchi, M., & Chen, J. (2019). Affective influences without approach-avoidance actions: On the congruence between valence and stimulus-response mappings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1547-1
Yamaguchi, M., Chen, J., Mishler, S., & Proctor, R. W. (2018). Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: Does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses? Cognition & Emotion, 32(5), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1381073
Zhang, Y., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Influence of intermixed emotion-relevant trials on the affective Simon effect. Experimental Psychology, 55(6), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.55.6.409
Descargas
Publicado
2020-10-24
Número
Sección
Número Temático Cérebro & Mente: Reflexões e Processos Psicológicos Básicos
