Vol. 26 No. 2 (2020): Dossier - Heritage and International Relations
Dossiê

Political Issues of the Louvre's Internationalisation

Marie-Alix Molinié-Andlauer
Sorbonne Université

Published 2020-09-10

Keywords

  • National Branding,
  • Geopolitics,
  • Louvre,
  • Heritage,
  • Controversies

How to Cite

Molinié-Andlauer, Marie-Alix. 2020. “Political Issues of the Louvre’s Internationalisation”. Locus: History Journal 26 (2):150-68. https://doi.org/10.34019/2594-8296.2020.v26.30963.

Abstract

This article focuses on the internationalisation of the Louvre since the 2000s. A flagship of French culture, it is, along with the British Museum in London, the universal museum of reference. The French state, through successive governments, has mobilised the Louvre, that is, the institution, as an intermediary in international agreements. This museum and cultural institution then become a real stakeholder in international relations. Thus, the whole point of our remarks is to analyse the issues and controversies surrounding the close relationship between the Louvre and the French State. The Louvre, a renowned French museum and heritage site, is now multi-spatial. This model responds in part to a request from the French government to perfect the interplay of international influence. The internationalisation of the Louvre is thus understood not as the Louvre's reputation on an international level, but as the use of this heritage in international political strategies. By approaching this case in French international relations, we can first of all question the stakes of the transition from heritage to National Branding. In other words, to understand how in contemporary literature, heritage is transformed not only as a tool to retrace the past of a society, but also how it becomes an emblem that can be mobilised by States to claim a form of legitimacy from other States. The method, which is essentially based on interviews conducted within the framework of these, aims to answer two questions. What does the deterritorialisation of a national heritage such as the Louvre produce regarding international relations between the Louvre, the city of Abu Dhabi and in relations between France and the United Arab Emirates, then the impact that the Louvre Abu Dhabi can have at the local and regional level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Ajana, Btihaj. “Branding, legitimation and the power of museums: The case of the Louvre Abu Dhabi. Museum and Society”. Museum and Society, 13, n.3 (2015): 322-341. https://doi.org/10.29311/mas.v13i3.333
  2. Allen, Richard. “Heritage and nationalism”. In Understanding the Politics of Heritage, Understanding global heritage, ed. Rodney Harrison, 197-233. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010.
  3. Ang, Ien. “What are museums for? The enduring friction between nationalism and cosmopolitanism”, Identities, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2016.1260019
  4. Boulanger, Philippe. “Le positionnement géostratégique de la France dans le golfe AraboPersique : la base interarmées d'Abu Dhabi”. Outre-Terre, 29, n3 (2011) : 531-537. https://doi.org/10.3917/oute.029.0531
  5. Cachin, Françoise, Jean Clair, Roland Recht. “Les musées ne sont pas à vendre”, La tribune de l’art, 2006.
  6. Chauvin, Pierre-Marie. “La sociologie des réputations. Une définition et cinq questions”, Communications, n.93 (2013) : 131-145. https://doi.org/10.3917/commu.093.0131
  7. de Font-Réaulx, Dominique. “Chapitre 3. Le Louvre, modèle singulier pour le musée universel ?”. In Le Louvre Abu Dhabi. Nouveau musée universel ?, ed. Charlotte Chastel-Rousseau, 45-62. Presses Universitaires de France, 2016. https://doi.org/10.3917/rom.173.0045
  8. des Cars, Laurence. “Le Louvre-Abou Dabi, une réponse française à la mondialisation ? Un aperçu”. Les cahiers Irice, 3, n. 1 (2009) : 59-61. https://doi.org/10.3917/lci.003.0059
  9. Decree n°2008-879, Agreement “between the Government of the French Republic and the Government of the United Arab Emirates on the Universal Museum of Abu Dhabi, signed in Abu Dhabi on 6 March 2007”: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000019417311&dateTexte=.
  10. El Amrousi, Mohamed, Mohamed Elhakeem, Evan Paleologos. “International Museums and Transcultural Impact on Gulf States: The Louvre Abu Dhabi as a Case Study”, In Human Systems Engineering and Design, 1-6. Publisher: Springer Nature Swirzerland, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02053-8_24
  11. Gervits, Maya. “Historicism, Nationalism, and Museum Architecture in Russia from the Nineteenth to the Turn of the Twentieth Century”, Visual Resources, Volume 27, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973762.2011.542352
  12. Gillen, Jamie. “Tourism and Nation Building at the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam”. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 104, n.6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.944459
  13. Grincheva, Natalia. “Museums as Actors of City Diplomacy: From “Hardware” Resources to “Soft” Power Strategies”. In City Diplomacy: Current Trends and Future Prospects, ed. Sevin, E. and A. Sohaela. Palgrave MacMillan, 2020a. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45615-3_6
  14. Grincheva, Natalia. “Glocal diplomacy of Louvre Abu Dhabi: Museum diplomacy on the crossroads of local, national and global ambitions”. Museum Management and Curatorship, 35, n.1 (2020b) : 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2019.1683883
  15. Jacquot, Sébastien. “Analyser l’action publique patrimoniale, un triple regard sur la patrimonialisation”. Construction politique et sociale des territoires, n.1 (2012) : 7-18.
  16. Kavoura, Androniki. “Politics of Heritage Promotion: Branding the Identity of the Greek State”, Tourism Culture & Communication, 15, n. 2-3 (2012): 69-83. https://doi.org/10.3727/109830413X13575858951086
  17. Krebs, Anne, Franck Mermier. “Louvre Abu Dhabi: a Clash of Cosmopolitanisms?”. In Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism and Global Culture, Youth in a Globalizing World, Volume: 9, 295-312. Publisher: Brill, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004411487_015
  18. Lemieux, Cyril. “À quoi sert l'analyse des controverses ?”. Mil neuf cent. Revue d'histoire intellectuelle, 25, n. 1 (2007) : 191-212. https://doi.org/10.3917/mnc.025.0191
  19. Matsuura, Koïchiro. “L'enjeu culturel au cœur des relations internationales”, Politique étrangère, hiver, n.4 (2006) : 1045-1057. https://doi.org/10.3917/pe.064.1045
  20. Melé, Patrice. “Heritage conflicts and urban regulations”. ESO, 51-57, 2005.
  21. Mitter, Rana. “Behind the Scenes at the Museum: Nationalism, History and Memory in the Beijing War of Resistance Museum, 1987–1997”, Volume 161, Published online by Cambridge University Press, 279-293, 2009 [2000]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000004033
  22. Molinié-Andlauer, Marie-Alix. “Musée et pouvoir symbolique”. Doctoral Theses, Paris, Sorbonne University-Humanities, 2019.
  23. Peyre, Nicolas. “Le Centre Pompidou Málaga, un exemple de la mondialisation de l’immatériel et de la diplomatie d’influence française”. In Marques muséales, un espace public revisité, ed. Martine Regourd, 155-167. Institut universitaire Varenne/Collection Colloques & Essais, Lextenso LGDJ, 2018.
  24. Ponzini, Davide. “Large scale development projects and star architecture in the absence of democratic politics: The case of Abu Dhabi, UAE”. Cities, 28, n.3 (2011): 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2011.02.002
  25. Poulin, T. L. “An Oasis in the Desert? Issues and Intricacies Concerning the Louvre-Abu Dhabi Museum Expansion”, Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, n°2, 2010.
  26. Ritvala, Tiina, Rebecca Piekkari, Franck Henrika and Nina Granqvist. “The International Expansion of an Art Museum: Guggenheim’s Global–Local Contexts”. In Growth Frontiers in International Business, ed. Kevin Ibeh & al., 145-166. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48851-6_8
  27. Stara, Alexandra. “The Louvre Effect”. In: Skiascope 7: Art, Museum, Architecture, ed. Arvidsson Kristoffer, 50-87. Gothenburg, Sweden: Gothenburg Museum of Art, 2015.