Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?

Authors

  • Livia de Almeida Alvarenga Universidade Federal Fluminense
  • Michelle Andrade Moreira Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Beatriz Cristina Pereira Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Aline Silva de Aguiar Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2821

Keywords:

Dialysis. Peritoneal dialysis. Hemodialysis. Nutritional status. Biochemical tests. Anthropometry.

Abstract

Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are the most commonly used renal replacement therapy. The nutritional status of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients can be influenced by the dialysis modality used. Objective: To compare the nutritional status of patients in HD and PD, through anthropometric and biochemical evaluation. This is a cross-sectional study carried out in the nephrology sector of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Juiz de Fora. The study consisted of 29 patients in PD and 36 in HD, totaling 65 patients. The data collected were: dry body weight, stature, body mass index (BMI), arm muscle area (BMA), arm muscle circumference (BMC), triceps skin fold and arm circumference. In addition, the biochemical tests: potassium, phosphorus, urea and albumin. It is possible to observe a higher prevalence of female sex in the PD modality in relation to HD (75% X 44.4%, p = 0.01). There was a difference in dialysis times between groups (SD: 41.86 ± 33.2 months X HD: 22.36 ± 5.4 months, p = 0.001). Regarding BMC classification, 48.3% of patients in PD and 22.2% in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). As for BMA, 72.5% of patients in PD and 36.1% of patients in HD were classified as eutrophic (p = 0.001). In relation to the biochemical tests, only potassium had a significant difference between the groups (SD: 4.9 ± 0.73 mEq / L and HD: 5.64 ± 0.78 mEq / L, p = 0.01). In the present study, patients in PD present better classification in relation to BMC and BMA, in addition to better control of serum potassium, compared to patients in HD.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ARENAS, V. G. et al. Qualidade de Vida : comparação entre diálise peritoneal automatizada e hemodiálise *. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem, v. 22, n. 9 , p. 535–539 , set. 2009.

AVESANI, C. M.; KAMIMURA, M. A.; CUPPARI, L. Energy expenditure in chronic kidney disease patients. Journal of Renal Nutrition: the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation, v. 21, n. 1, p. 27–30, jan. 2011.

BASTOS, Marcus G et al. Doença Renal Crônica : Problemas e Soluções. , [S.d.].

CAETANO, A. L.; CUPPARI, L.; KAMIMURA, M. A. Espessura do músculo adutor do polegar como preditor da força de preensão manual nos pacientes em hemodiálise. p. 177–184 , [S.d.].

CENTRE, Monash Medical. The epidemiology of chronic kidney disease. v. 67, p. 14–18, 2005.

CUPPARI, L.; KAMIMURA, M. A. Avaliação nutricional na doença renal crônica: desafios na prática clínica. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, v. 31, n. 1, p. 28–35, jan. 2009.

FAVALESSA, E. et al. Avaliação Nutricional e Consumo Alimentar de Pacientes com Insuficiência Renal Crônica. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Saúde v. 11, n. 4, p. 39–48, abr. 2009.

FERNANDES, N. M. S. et al. Body size and longitudinal body weight changes do not increase mortality in incident peritoneal dialysis patients of the Brazilian peritoneal dialysis multicenter study. Clinics (São Paulo, Brazil), v. 68, n. 1, p. 51–58 , fev. 2013.

HOMBURG, B. Cálculo de Kt / V em hemodiálise : comparação entre fórmulas. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia v. 34, n. 1, p. 22–26 , jan. 2012.

IOLA, E.; ANDRADE, G. Sobrevida de pacientes em diálise no SUS no Brasil Survival analysis of dialysis patients in the Brazilian Unifi ed National Health System. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 28, n. 3, p. 415–424 , mar. 2012.

KOPPLE, J D. National kidney foundation K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. American journal of kidney diseases:The official journal of the National Kidney Foundation v. 37, n. 1 Suppl 2, p. S66–S70 , fev. 2001.

KOVESDY, C. P.; FURTH, S.; ZOCCALI, C. Obesity and kidney disease: hidden consequences of the epidemic Obesidad y enfermedad renal: las consecuencias ocultas de una epidemia. PersPectiva rev Med chile, v. 145, n. 2, p. 281–291 , fev. 2017.

MANSUR, H. N.; DAMASCENO, V. O.; BASTOS, M. G. Prevalência da fragilidade entre os pacientes com doença renal crônica em tratamento conservador e em diálise. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, v. 34, n. 2, p. 153–160 , fev. 2012.

MICHELIS, R. et al. Oxidative modifications impair albumin quantification. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, v. 401, n. 1, p. 137–142 , jan; 2010. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.09.027>.1090-2104.

NASCIMENTO, D. et al. Experience report : food and nutrition education with chronic renal failure patients on hemodialysis Relato de experiência : educação alimentar e nutricional com pacientes renais crônicos em hemodiálise. Nutricion clinica y dietetica hospitalaria, v. 36, n. 3, p. 31–37, mar. 2016.

OLIVEIRA, G. T. et al. Avaliação nutricional de pacientes submetidos à hemodiálise em centros de Belo Horizonte. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira v. 58, n. 2, p. 240–247 , fev. 2012.

PEREIRA, R. A. et al. Sarcopenia in chronic kidney disease on conservative therapy : prevalence and association with mortality. Nome do periódico, v.30 , n. 10 , p. 1718–1725, out. 2015.

RIGONI, M. et al. Survival and time-to-transplantation of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease patients: competing-risks regression model in a single Italian center experience. Journal of Nephrology, v. 30, n. 3, p. 441–447, mar. 2017. Disponível em: <http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40620-016-0366-6>.

SALAMON, K. et al. Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Have Higher Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Than Hemodialysis Patients. Journal of Renal Nutrition v. 23, n. 2, p. 114–118 , fev. 2013. Disponível em: <http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2012.02.007>.

SANDERS, H. N. et al. Effect of potassium concentration in dialysate on total body potassium. Journal of Renal Nutrition, v. 8, n. 2, p 64-68, fev. 1998.

SESSO, R. C. et al. Brazilian Chronic Dialysis Census 2014. Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, v. 38, n. 1, p. 54–61 , jan. 2016.

SESSO, R. C. et al. Inquérito Brasileiro de Diálise Crônica 2016. Jornal Brasileito de Nefrologia, v. 39, n. 3, p. 261-266, mar. 2017.

STEFANELLI, C. et al. Avaliação nutricional de pacientes em hemodiálise Nutritional. Journal of the health sciences institute, v. 28, n. 3, p. 268–271, mar. 2010.

ZUIJDEWIJN, C. L. M. R. V. et al. A Comparison of 8 Nutrition-Related Tests to Predict Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients. Journal Renal Nutrition, v. 25, n. 5, p. 412–419 , set. 2015.

Published

2019-01-09

How to Cite

1.
Alvarenga L de A, Moreira MA, Pereira BC, Aguiar AS de. Patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: Is there any difference in the nutritional status?. HU Rev [Internet]. 2019Jan.9 [cited 2024Nov.24];43(4):325-30. Available from: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/2821

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

Most read articles by the same author(s)