Os modelos ortodônticos digitais são confiáveis? Uma revisão sistemática

Autores

  • Matheus Melo Pithon Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-4139
  • Leticia Sant'Anna
  • Ana Andrade
  • Orlando Tanaka
  • Lucianne Cople-Maia
  • Marcela Magno
  • Camila Amorim
  • Tarcila Santana Matos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2018.v44.13881

Palavras-chave:

Modelos dentários, Imagem tridimensional, Ortodontia.

Resumo

Introdução: os modelos digitais são alternativas para o uso de modelos ortodônticos em gesso. Devido a sua importância no dignostico, faz-se necessário averiguar a precisão dos softwares modelos ortodônticos digitais disponiveis.  Objetivo: evidenciar qual software de modelos ortodônticos digitais possui maior confiabilidade. Material e métodos: foi realizada busca sistemática nas seguintes bases de dados eletrônicas: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase e Cochrane, Grey Literature e Clinical Trials, sem limitações quanto ao ano de publicação ou idioma. Foram incluídos estudos laboratoriais que utilizaram softwares destinados a geração de modelos ortodônticos digitais, comparando-os com modelos ortodônticos em gesso. Após seleção por título e resumo, os artigos potencialmente elegíveis foram lidos na íntegra. A qualidade metodológica e o risco de viés dos artigos incluídos foram avaliados de acordo com as descrições dos modelos, técnicas de medição e análises estatísticas. A qualidade metodológica foi classificada em alta, moderada ou baixa. Resultados: 13.333 artigos foram encontrados nas bases de dados utilizadas. Após a aplicação dos critérios de elegibilidade e remoção de duplicações, restaram apenas 41 artigos. 29 foram considerados de qualidade moderada e 12 de alta qualidade. A classificação quanto à confiabilidade variou de menos confiaveis, equivalentes e a mais confiaveis. Apresentando diferenças estatisticas em suas mensurações (p<0.05), sem significância clínica. Conclusão: os modelos ortodônticos digitais apresentaram mensurações acuradas, reprodutíveis e confiáveis quando comparado ao método convencional utilizando modelos de gesso.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Matheus Melo Pithon, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia e Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Departamento de Saude I - UESB e Departamento de Odontopediatria e Ortodontia UFRJ

Referências

ABIZADEH, N. et al. Digital versus plaster study models: how accurate and reproducible are they? J Orthod, v. 39, n. 3, p. 151-9, Sep 2012. ISSN 1465-3133 (Electronic)

-3125 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22984099 >.

ASQUITH, J. A.; MCINTYRE, G. T. Dental arch relationships on three-dimensional digital study models and conventional plaster study models for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, v. 49, n. 5, p. 530-4, Sep 2012. ISSN 1545-1569 (Electronic)

-6656 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21214319 >.

BELL, A.; AYOUB, A. F.; SIEBERT, P. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system for archiving dental study models. J Orthod, v. 30, n. 3, p. 219-23, Sep 2003. ISSN 1465-3125 (Print)

-3125 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14530419 >.

BOOTVONG, K. et al. Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod, v. 32, n. 5, p. 589-95, Oct 2010. ISSN 1460-2210 (Electronic)

-5387 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20164126 >.

CAMARDELLA, L. T.; BREUNING, H.; DE VASCONCELLOS VILELLA, O. Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner. J Orofac Orthop, v. 78, n. 3, p. 211-220, May 2017. ISSN 1615-6714 (Electronic)

-5293 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28074260 >.

COSTALOS, P. A. et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 128, n. 5, p. 624-9, Nov 2005. ISSN 0889-5406 (Print)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286210 >.

CZARNOTA, J.; HEY, J.; FUHRMANN, R. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity. J Orofac Orthop, v. 77, n. 1, p. 22-30, Jan 2016. ISSN 1615-6714 (Electronic)

-5293 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26753549 >.

DALSTRA, M.; MELSEN, B. From alginate impressions to digital virtual models: accuracy and reproducibility. J Orthod, v. 36, n. 1, p. 36-41; discussion 14, Mar 2009. ISSN 1465-3133 (Electronic)

-3125 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19286874 >.

EL-ZANATY, H. M. et al. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 137, n. 2, p. 259-65, Feb 2010. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20152684 >.

FLEMING, P. S.; MARINHO, V.; JOHAL, A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-16, Feb 2011. ISSN 1601-6343 (Electronic)

-6335 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21205164 >.

FU, X. et al. The application of multi-baseline digital close-range photogrammetry in three-dimensional imaging and measurement of dental casts. PLoS One, v. 12, n. 6, p. e0178858, 2017. ISSN 1932-6203 (Electronic)

-6203 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28640827 >.

GREWAL, B. et al. Royal London space analysis: plaster versus digital model assessment. Eur J Orthod, v. 39, n. 3, p. 320-325, Jun 1 2017. ISSN 1460-2210 (Electronic)

-5387 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27511915 >.

GRUNHEID, T. et al. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 145, n. 2, p. 157-64, Feb 2014. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485729 >.

HAZEVELD, A.; HUDDLESTON SLATER, J. J.; REN, Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 145, n. 1, p. 108-15, Jan 2014. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373661 >.

HILDEBRAND, J. C. et al. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 133, n. 2, p. 283-9, Feb 2008. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18249296 >.

IM, J. et al. Comparison of virtual and manual tooth setups with digital and plaster models in extraction cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 145, n. 4, p. 434-42, Apr 2014. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24703281 >.

JIMENEZ-GAYOSSO, S. I. et al. Difference between manual and digital measurements of dental arches of orthodontic patients. Medicine (Baltimore), v. 97, n. 22, p. e10887, Jun 2018. ISSN 1536-5964 (Electronic)

-7974 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29851810 >.

JOFFE, L. OrthoCAD: digital models for a digital era. J Orthod, v. 31, n. 4, p. 344-7, Dec 2004. ISSN 1465-3125 (Print)

-3125 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15608352 >.

KANG, S. H. et al. Early orthognathic surgery with three-dimensional image simulation during presurgical orthodontics in adults. J Craniofac Surg, v. 22, n. 2, p. 473-81, Mar 2011. ISSN 1536-3732 (Electronic)

-2275 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21403556 >.

KASPAROVA, M. et al. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online, v. 12, p. 49, May 31 2013. ISSN 1475-925X (Electronic)

-925X (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23721330 >.

KEATING, A. P. et al. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod, v. 35, n. 3, p. 191-201; discussion 175, Sep 2008. ISSN 1465-3125 (Print)

-3125 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18809782 >.

KIM, J.; HEO, G.; LAGRAVERE, M. O. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod, v. 84, n. 3, p. 443-50, May 2014. ISSN 1945-7103 (Electronic)

-3219 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23957664 >.

KIM, J. H. et al. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod, v. 44, n. 2, p. 69-76, Mar 2014. ISSN 2234-7518 (Print). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696823 >.

KIM, S. Y. et al. Comparison of the accuracy of digitally fabricated polyurethane model and conventional gypsum model. J Adv Prosthodont, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1-7, Feb 2014. ISSN 2005-7806 (Print)

-7806 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24605199 >.

KORETSI, V. et al. Intra-observer reliability and agreement of manual and digital orthodontic model analysis. Eur J Orthod, v. 40, n. 1, p. 52-57, Jan 23 2018. ISSN 1460-2210 (Electronic)

-5387 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28531341 >.

LEIFERT, M. F. et al. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 136, n. 1, p. 16 e1-4; discussion 16, Jul 2009. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19577140 >.

LUU, N. S. et al. The validity, reliability, and time requirement of study model analysis using cone-beam computed tomography-generated virtual study models. Orthod Craniofac Res, v. 17, n. 1, p. 14-26, Feb 2014. ISSN 1601-6343 (Electronic)

-6335 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23590668 >.

MAH, J. The evolution of digital study models. J Clin Orthod, v. 41, n. 9, p. 557-61; quiz 424, Sep 2007. ISSN 0022-3875 (Print)

-3875 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17921602 >.

MANGIACAPRA, R. et al. Traditional plaster casts and dental digital models: intra-examiner reliability of measurements. Prog Orthod, v. 10, n. 2, p. 48-53, 2009. ISSN 1723-7785 (Print)

-7785 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20545091 >.

MULLEN, S. R. et al. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 132, n. 3, p. 346-52, Sep 2007. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17826603 >.

MURUGESAN, K. et al. Comparative evaluation of dimension and surface detail accuracy of models produced by three different rapid prototype techniques. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, v. 12, n. 1, p. 16-20, Mar 2012. ISSN 0972-4052 (Print)

-4052 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23449946 >.

NALCACI, R.; TOPCUOGLU, T.; OZTURK, F. Comparison of Bolton analysis and tooth size measurements obtained using conventional and three-dimensional orthodontic models. Eur J Dent, v. 7, n. Suppl 1, p. S66-70, Sep 2013. ISSN 1305-7456 (Print). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24966731 >.

OKUNAMI, T. R. et al. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 131, n. 1, p. 51-6, Jan 2007. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17208106 >.

RANGEL, F. A. et al. Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans. PLoS One, v. 8, n. 3, p. e59130, 2013. ISSN 1932-6203 (Electronic)

-6203 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23527111 >.

RHEUDE, B. et al. An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Angle Orthod, v. 75, n. 3, p. 300-4, May 2005. ISSN 0003-3219 (Print)

-3219 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15898364 >.

SANCHES, J. O. et al. Comparison of space analysis performed on plaster vs. digital dental casts applying Tanaka and Johnston's equation. Dental Press J Orthod, v. 18, n. 1, p. 128-33, Jan-Feb 2013. ISSN 2177-6709 (Electronic)

-9451 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23876960 >.

SANTORO, M. et al. Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 124, n. 1, p. 101-5, Jul 2003. ISSN 0889-5406 (Print)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12867904 >.

SFONDRINI, M. F. et al. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback. Biomed Res Int, v. 2018, p. 4103232, 2018. ISSN 2314-6141 (Electronic). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850512 >.

SJOGREN, A. P.; LINDGREN, J. E.; HUGGARE, J. A. Orthodontic study cast analysis--reproducibility of recordings and agreement between conventional and 3D virtual measurements. J Digit Imaging, v. 23, n. 4, p. 482-92, Aug 2010. ISSN 1618-727X (Electronic)

-1889 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19526268 >.

STEVENS, D. R. et al. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 129, n. 6, p. 794-803, Jun 2006. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16769498 >.

TAVARES, A.; BRAGA, E.; ARAUJO, T. M. Digital models: How can dental arch form be verified chairside? Dental Press J Orthod, v. 22, n. 6, p. 68-73, Nov-Dec 2017. ISSN 2177-6709 (Electronic)

-9451 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29364382 >.

VEENEMA, A. C. et al. Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need scored on plaster and digital models. Eur J Orthod, v. 31, n. 3, p. 281-6, Jun 2009. ISSN 1460-2210 (Electronic)

-5387 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19329650 >.

WATANABE-KANNO, G. A. et al. Determination of tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton ratios using Bibliocast Cecile3 digital models. Int Orthod, v. 8, n. 3, p. 215-26, Sep 2010. ISSN 1879-680X (Electronic)

-7727 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739241 >.

WATANABE-KANNO, G. A. et al. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models. Braz Oral Res, v. 23, n. 3, p. 288-95, Jul-Sep 2009. ISSN 1807-3107 (Electronic)

-8324 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19893964 >.

WIRANTO, M. G. et al. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, v. 143, n. 1, p. 140-7, Jan 2013. ISSN 1097-6752 (Electronic)

-5406 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23273370 >.

YUAN, F. S. et al. Accuracy evaluation of a new three-dimensional reproduction method of edentulous dental casts, and wax occlusion rims with jaw relation. Int J Oral Sci, v. 5, n. 3, p. 155-61, Sep 2013. ISSN 1674-2818 (Print)

-2818 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23907676 >.

ZHANG, F.; SUH, K. J.; LEE, K. M. Validity of Intraoral Scans Compared with Plaster Models: An In-Vivo Comparison of Dental Measurements and 3D Surface Analysis. PLoS One, v. 11, n. 6, p. e0157713, 2016. ISSN 1932-6203 (Electronic)

-6203 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27304976 >.

ZILBERMAN, O.; HUGGARE, J. A.; PARIKAKIS, K. A. Evaluation of the validity of tooth size and arch width measurements using conventional and three-dimensional virtual orthodontic models. Angle Orthod, v. 73, n. 3, p. 301-6, Jun 2003. ISSN 0003-3219 (Print)

-3219 (Linking). Disponível em: < http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12828439 >.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-02-08

Como Citar

1.
Pithon MM, Sant’Anna L, Andrade A, Tanaka O, Cople-Maia L, Magno M, Amorim C, Matos TS. Os modelos ortodônticos digitais são confiáveis? Uma revisão sistemática. hu rev [Internet]. 8º de fevereiro de 2019 [citado 16º de agosto de 2022];44(1):97-113. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/13881

Edição

Seção

Artigos de Revisão Sistemática