An exploration of 'cunt'-derived neologisms in present-day English
Palavras-chave:
Cunt, Neologisms, Derivational Morphology, Construction GrammarResumo
This paper explores the emergence of neologisms derived from the word "cunt" in contemporary English, particularly within the context of internet communication. Traditionally considered a rather offensive word in English, "cunt" has undergone a notable transformation in social media settings, acquiring more positive and varied connotations. An example of a “cunt”-related neologism is “I was bored, so I decided to cuntify my lighter” (X, 2024), in which “cuntify” means to make something more charming or appealing. Thus, this study aims to document and analyze the new uses of “cunt,” focusing on how they integrate into broader linguistic frameworks such as Derivational Morphology and Construction Grammar. The research involved extracting data from the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to capture real-time usage of "cunt"-derived neologisms. By applying derivational suffixes listed by Crystal (2018), such as "-age," "-dom," "-ery," "-hood," "-ism," "-ocracy," and "-ship," the study identified a range of new terms like "cuntage," "cuntdom," "cuntery," "cunthood," "cuntism," "cuntocracy," and "cuntship." These neologisms reflect diverse meanings, often highlighting attributes like empowerment, boldness, and innovation. Analysis also identified potential analogies based on phonetic similarity, such as "cunter scale" mirroring "Richter scale," "cuntic" mirroring “Atlantic,” and "cuntette" aligning with "cadette," among others. These analogies likely arise from the term "cunt" being highly adaptable, allowing it to integrate seamlessly with various morphological structures and representations. Analysis also utilized Fillmore et al.'s (1988) framework for classifying constructions. The study found that "cunt"-related neologisms typically fall under decoding constructions, as they require contextual understanding for their meanings. Moreover, they adhere to standard grammatical rules, rendering them grammatical constructions, and they exhibit flexibility in form and meaning, characteristic of formal constructions. Findings also suggest that these neologisms are highly productive in present-day English, contributing to the evolving landscape of internet language and reflecting broader cultural shifts towards inclusivity and self-expression.
Downloads
Referências
BEIRNE, Piers. Animals, women and terms of abuse: Towards a cultural etymology of Con (e) y, Cunny, Cunt and C* nt. Critical Criminology, v. 28, p. 327-349, 2020.
BRINGE, Maya Jerome. A particle on the edge: a semantic/syntactic analysis of Russian khot. 2006. Master’s Dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
BRINTON, Donna M.; BRINTON, Laurel J. The linguistic structure of modern English. The Linguistic Structure of Modern English, p. 1-446, 2010.
BROWN, Keith. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Elsevier, 2005.
BYBEE, Joan. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
CARSTAIRS-MCCARTHY, Andrew. Introduction to English Morphology: words and their structure. Edinburgh university press, 2017.
CRYSTAL, David. The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language. Cambridge university press, 2018.
CURZAN, Anne; ADAMS, Michael. How English works: a linguistic introduction. Pearson, 2014.
DIESSEL, Holger. The constructicon: taxonomies and networks. Cambridge University Press, 2023.
EDDINGTON, David; MENDOZA, Francisco J. Argument constructions and language processing: Evidence from a priming experiment and pedagogical implications. Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics, v. 17, p. 213, 2010.
ETYMONLINE. Available at: https://www.etymonline.com. Accessed on: 25 jun. 2024.
FILLMORE, Charles J.; KAY, Paul; O'CONNOR, Mary Catherine. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language, v. 64, n. 3, p. 501-538, 1988.
GOLDBERG, Adele E. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 7, n. 5, p. 219-224, 2003.
Hamawand, Zeki 2011. Morphology in English. Word formation in Cognitive Grammar. Jezikoslovlje, v. 18, n. 2., p. 370-374, 2017.
HOFFMANN, Thomas. Construction grammar. Cambridge University Press, 2022.
HOFFMANN, Thomas; TROUSDALE, Graeme. The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press, 2013.
LIND, Saga; ERIKSSON, Hannah. Serving Cunt: Feministiska motståndsstrategier möter TikToks medielogik. 2024.
MCCULLOCH, Gretchen. Because internet: understanding how language is changing. Random House, 2019.
O’GRADY, W. Contemporary Linguistic Analysis: An Introduction. Pearson, 2016.
SCHULTZE-BERNDT, Eva. Constructions in language description. Functions of language, v. 9, n. 2, p. 269-310, 2002.
TRASK, Robert Lawrence. A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. Routledge, 2013.
URBAN DICTIONARY. Available at: https://www.urbandictionary.com. Accessed on: 25 jun. 2024.
X. Available at: https://www.twitter.com. Accessed on: 25 jun. 2024.