Vol. 27 No. 1 (2021): Dossier - Visions of Chinese History
Dossiê

Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and the Importance of Confucian Kinship Relations: Li Zehou, Shamanist Tradition and Relationalism (關係主義)

Published 2021-05-13

Keywords

  • Li Zehou,
  • kinship relations,
  • shamanism,
  • sedimentation,
  • rituality

How to Cite

S. Rošker, Jana. 2021. “Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and the Importance of Confucian Kinship Relations: Li Zehou, Shamanist Tradition and Relationalism (關係主義)”. Locus: History Journal 27 (1):106-21. https://doi.org/10.34019/2594-8296.2021.v27.33102.

Abstract

Li Zehou belongs to the most influential Chinese philosophers of our time. This paper will present a critical introduction of his theory regarding the consolidation of the specific Confucian system of kinship relations, which for him forms a crucial foundation of traditional Chinese social order. In Confucianism, the inter-familial relations form a basis of the social system, in which interpersonal relations are of utmost importance and which Li therefore denotes as “relationalism”. According to him, this kinship-based Confucian model originates in shamanistic rituality performed by Neolithic humans living in the land occupied by modern-day China. These Neolithic cultures were rather advanced and based their societies on small-scale semi-agricultural production, in which communities were mainly constructed through kinship relationships. Shamanistic ceremonies were enhancing and strengthening the awareness of such social unities. These early collective rites, especially those that include music and dance, had a powerful effect on early humans, creating intense feelings of respect, love and loyalty, and thus forming a basis for the Confucian social order based upon kinship relations, and the Confucian ethics, rooted in interpersonal humanness. Li’s theory of the shamanist origins of Confucian relationalism will be critically illuminated through the lens of current historical and anthropological scholarship on shamanist rituality and their function within the corresponding cultural orders. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abrahms-Kavunenko, Saskia. “Spiritually Enmeshed, Socially Enmeshed: Shamanism and Belonging in Ulaanbaatar”. Social Analysis, n. 60, 3 (2016): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2016.600301
  2. Ames, Roger T. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p9wqgm
  3. Bacigalupo, Ana Mariella. “Ritual Gendered Relationships: Kinship, Marriage, Mastery, and Machi Modes of Personhood”. Journal of Anthropological Research, n. 60, 2 (2004) 60(2): 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.60.2.3630816
  4. Bird-David, Nurit. “‘Animism’ Revisited: Personhood, Environment, Relational Epistemology”. Current Anthropology, n. 40, Supplement (1999): 67-91. https://doi.org/10.1086/200061
  5. Chandler, Marthe. “Li Zehou, Kant in Darwin: teorija sedimentacije (Li Zehou, Kant, and Darwin: The Theory of Sedimentation)”. In Li Zehou in sodobna kitajska filozofija—zgodovinska ontologija, estetika in nadgradnje marksizma, edited by Jana S. Rosker, and Katja Kolšek, Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba FF, 2016: 131-176.
  6. D’Ambrosio, Carleo, Robert, and Andrew Lambert. “On Li Zehou’s Philosophy: An Introduction by Three Translators”. Philosophy East and West, n. 66, 4 (2016): 1057–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2016.0083
  7. Eliade, Mircea. Images and Symbols: Studies in Religious Symbolism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
  8. Eliade, Mircea. Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.
  9. Gu, Ming Dong. “Modernizing Confucianism: Li Zehou’s Vision and Inspiration for an Unfinished Project”. Paper presented at the Conference “Li Zehou and Confucian Philosophy”, The East-West Center, University of Hawai’i at Manoa, Honolulu, October 8–11, 2015.
  10. Harvey, Graham. “Animism rather than Shamanism. New Approaches to what Shamans do (for other Animists)”. In Spirit Possession and Trance: New Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. Bettina Schmidt, and Lucy Huskinson, 14-34. London: Continuum, 2010.
  11. Jia, Jinhua. “Li Zehou’s Reconception of the Classical Confucian Concepts of Autonomy and Individuality: With a Focus on Reading the Analects Today”. Asian Studies, n. 8, 1 (2020): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.1.59-75
  12. Lee, Sangmi. “Traditionally transnational: Cultural continuity and change in Hmong shamanism across the diaspora”. Ethnography, n. 1 (2019): 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138119839086
  13. Li Zehou 李澤厚 You wu dao li, shi li gui ren 由巫到禮、釋禮歸仁 (From Shamanism to Rituality, Explaining Rituality as a Return to the Humanness). Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 2015.
  14. Li Zehou. “Guanyu zhutixingde buchong shuoming 關於主體性的補充說明 (A Supplementary Explanation of Subjectality)”. Zhongguo shehui kexue yuan yuanjiushengyuan xuebao, n. 1(1985): 14–21.
  15. Li, Zehou. The Chinese Aesthetic Tradition. Translated by Maija Bell Samei. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2010.
  16. Li, Zehou, and Jane Cauvel. Four Essays on Aesthetics: Toward a Global View. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2006.
  17. Lun heng jiao zhu 論衡校注. (The Book “On Balance” with Comments and Annotations). Ed. by Zhang Zongxiang and Zheng Zhaochang. Shanghai: Shanghai guji chuban she, 2010.
  18. Lunyu 论语 (The Confucian Analects). In: Si shu da quan jiaozhu /shang/ (An Annotated and Complete Collection of the Four Books: Part One) Wuhan: Wuhan daxue chuban she, 2009: 322-756.
  19. Lü shi Chunqiu yi zhu 吕氏春秋譯注. (Master Lü’s Spring and Autumn Annals with Translations and Comments). Edited by Shuangdi, Zhang, et al. Beijing: Beijing daxue chuban she, 2011.
  20. McKhann, Charles F. “Crimes against Nature: Kincest, Cosmology, and Conservation in Southwest China”. Anthropological Forum, n. 27, 4 (2017): 382–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2017.1284043
  21. Rošker, Jana S. The Rebirth of the Moral Self: The Second Generation of Modern Confucians and their Modernization Discourses. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1p9wqwt
  22. Rošker, Jana S. Following his own Path: Li Zehou and Modern Chinese Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York, 2019.
  23. Shang shu 尚書 (Book of Documents). Translated and edited by Legge, James. In The Shoo King, Vol. 1 of The Chinese Classics. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue chuban she, 2011.
  24. Shi ji 史記 (Historical Notes). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2013.
  25. Sernelj, Téa. “Different Approaches to Modern Art and Society: Li Zehou versus Xu Fuguan”. Asian Studies, n. 8, 1 (2020): 77–98. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.1.77-98
  26. Sigurðsson, Geir. Confucian Propriety and Ritual Learning – A Philosophical Interpretation. Albany: State University of New York, 2015.
  27. Van den Stock, Ady. “Imprints of the Thing in Itself: Li Zehou’s Critique of Critical Philosophy and the Historicization of the Transcendental”. Asian Studies, n. 8, 1 (2020): 15–35. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.1.15-35
  28. Wang, Keping. “Behind Harmony and Justice”. Asian Studies, n. 8, 1 (2020): 101–125. https://doi.org/10.4312/as.2020.8.1.101-125
  29. Wellens, Koen. “Resilient Cosmologies: Water Deities and Divine Agency in Post-Mao China”. Anthropological Forum, n. 27, 4 (2017): 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2017.1284042
  30. Winkelman, Michael. “Shamanism and the Evolutionary Origins of Spirituality and Healing”. NeuroQuantology, n. 9, 1 (2011): 54–71. https://doi.org/10.14704/nq.2011.9.1.390
  31. Xu Fuguan 徐復觀. “Zhongguo renxing lun shi—Xian Qin pian 中國人性論史——先秦篇 (The Theory of Human Nature: The Pre-Qin Chapter).” In Xiandai xin rujia xue’an 現代新儒家學案 (A Study of Modern Confucianism), edited by Fang Keli 方克立 and Li Jinquan 李錦全Vol. 3. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chuban she, 1987: 647-62.
  32. Yamada, Takako. An Anthropology of Animism and Shamanism. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1999.
  33. Zhou li 周禮 (The Rites of Zhou). Edited and commented by Xu Zhengying and Chang Peiyu. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 2014.