Vol. 26 No. 2 (2020): Dossier - Heritage and International Relations
Dossiê

Regional Assets, Industrial Growth, Global Reach: the Case Study of the Film Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area

pdf
  • Frédéric Leriche
Frédéric Leriche
UVSQ
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34019/2594-8296.2020.v26.31327

Published 2020-09-10 — Updated on 2021-04-30

Versions

Keywords

  • Film Industry,
  • San Francisco Bay,
  • Regional Assets

How to Cite

Leriche, Frédéric. (2020) 2021. “Regional Assets, Industrial Growth, Global Reach: The Case Study of the Film Industry in the San Francisco Bay Area”. Locus: History Journal 26 (2):29-51. https://doi.org/10.34019/2594-8296.2020.v26.31327.

Copyright (c) 2020 frederic leriche

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Within the US motion picture industry, Hollywood is a (big) tree that hides the forest. Indeed, in this industry, besides this powerful and dominating industrial cluster, there are other — though minor — clusters, particularly in New York and San Francisco. The paper focuses on the latter and argues that the development of the film industry in the San Francisco Bay Area relies on specific regional assets: (1) a unique urban context and experience, (2) a unique alternative culture, and (3) a world-class technological cluster. The paper starts by briefly describing the path dependency of the film industry in the Bay Area, and how the city of San Francisco has started (in the 1980s) to implement a dedicated policy aimed at promoting the development of this industry. In this context, the paper explores the way that the San Francisco Bay Area became an attractive place for filmmakers and the fact that the 1970s marked the beginning of a new regime of film shootings. The paper then describes how, since then, the Bay Area asserted itself as a place for film production, and that has resulted in a multisite and smoothly expanding industrial cluster with a quite dynamic local labor market. Finally, the paper questions the mechanics of the film industry cluster in the Bay Area, its connections with Hollywood, and its impacts on the global influence of San Francisco.

pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afi. 2007. “AFI's 100 Years...100 Movies – 10th Anniversary Edition”. https://www.afi.com/afis-100-years-100-movies-10th-anniversary-edition/.
  2. Barack, Lauren. “Unwelcome Tramp”. Metroactive, Metro Publishing Inc, June 4th to 10th, 1998. http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/06.04.98/slices-9822.html
  3. Benko, Georges, and Alain Lipietz, eds. Les régions qui gagnent. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1992.
  4. Boschma, Ron. “Proximity and Innovation: a Critical Assessment”. Regional Studies, 39, 1 (2005): 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
  5. Brugman, Bruce, and Greggar Sletteland. The Ultimate Highrise: San Francisco’s Mad Rush toward the Sky. San Francisco: Bay Guardian Books, 1971.
  6. Celnik, Julie. “L’environnementalisme américain à San Francisco”. In Giband, David, éd. L’Amérique du Nord au XXIème siècle: enjeux, défis et perspectives. 145-157. Paris: Ellipses, 2012.
  7. Chapain, Caroline, and Krzysztof Stachowiak. “Innovation Dynamic in the Film Industry: The Case of the Soho Cluster in London”. In Chapain, Caroline, and Tadeusz Stryjakiewicz, eds. Creative industries in Europe: drivers of sectoral and spatial dynamic. 65-94. Cham: Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56497-5_4
  8. Christopherson, Susan, and Michael Storper. “City as Studio, the World as Back Lot: The Impact of Vertical Disintegration on the Location of the Motion Picture Industry”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 4 (1986): 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1068/d040305
  9. Coe, Neil. “A Hybrid Agglomeration? The development of Satellite-Marshallian Industrial District in Vancouver’s Film Industry”. Urban Studies, 38 (2001): 1753-1775. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120084840
  10. Colletis, Gabriel, and Bernard Pecqueur. “Les facteurs de la concurrence spatiale et la construction des territoires”. In Péraldi, Michel, and Évelyne Perrin, éds. Réseaux productifs et territoires urbains. 167-182. Toulouse: PUM, 1996.
  11. Epstein, Edward Jay. The Big Picture: The New Logic of Money and Power in Hollywood. New York: Random House, 2005.
  12. Filmsf. “Film Comission”. https://filmsf.org/film-commission.
  13. Florida, Richard. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
  14. Garud, Raghu, and Peter Karnøe, eds. Path Dependence and Creation. Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum ed., 2001.
  15. Gumuchian, Hervé, and Bernard Pecqueur, éds. La ressource territoriale. Paris: Economica, 2007.
  16. ICF Consulting. 2007. San Francisco Film Cluster Economic Analysis. San Francisco: Report for the San Francisco Film Office.
  17. Kenney, Martin, ed. Understanding Silicon Valley. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
  18. Landry, Charles, and Franco Bianchini. The creative City. London: Demos / Comedia, 1995.
  19. Leriche, Frédéric, and Jasper Rubin. “Contre-culture et territoire: de North Beach à Haight-Ashbury (San Francisco)”. In Robert, Frédéric, éd. Révoltes et utopies: la contre-culture américaine dans les années soixante. 119-129. Paris: Ellipses, 2011.
  20. Leriche, Frédéric, and Jasper Rubin. “Économie culturelle et urbanisation: San Francisco, produit culturel”. In Vallas, Sophie, Phelan Richard, Mathé Sylvie, and Christol Hélène, éds. San Francisco. À l’Ouest d’Éden, 41-55. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence, 2012.
  21. Lewis, Jon. The Godfather. London: BFI Publishing, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-92423-3
  22. Lippy, Tod, ed. New York Film-makers on Film-making. London: Faber and Faber, 2000.
  23. Malik, Sarita, Caroline Chapain, and Roberta Comunian. Community Filmmaking: Diversity, Practices and Places. London; New York: Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642727
  24. Markusen, Ann, and David King. The Artistic Dividend. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2003.
  25. Mingant, Nolwenn. “La Motion Picture Export Association de Jack Valenti (1966-2004), corps diplomatique des majors hollywoodiennes à l’étranger”. Revue française d’études américaines, 121 (2009): 102-114. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfea.121.0102
  26. Nye, Joseph. Soft Power: The Means to Success in Worlds Politics. New York: PublicAffairs, 2009.
  27. Peirano, Pierre-François. “La représentation de San Francisco dans Dark Passage de Delmer Daves (1947)”. In Vallas, Sophie, Phelan Richard, Mathé Sylvie, and Christol Hélène, éds. San Francisco. À l’Ouest d’Éden. 207-218. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence, 2012.
  28. Pixar. “Feature Films”. https://www.pixar.com/feature-films-launch.
  29. Pleven, Bertrand. “Le cinéma contemporain et les territoires urbains en mutation : la capacité créatrice en question, pistes de réflexion sur le cas parisien”. Bulletin de L’Association de Géographes Français, 90, 2 (2013): 201-218. https://doi.org/10.4000/bagf.2319
  30. Pollock, Dale. Skywalking. The Life and Films of George Lukas. London: Elm Tree Books, 1983.
  31. Power, Dominic, and Allen John Scott, eds. Cultural Industries and the Production of Culture. London: Routledge, 2004.
  32. Scott, Allen John. New Industrial Spaces. London: Pion, 1988.
  33. Scott, Allen John. “Regional Push: the Geography of Development and Growth in Low and Middle-Income Countries”. Third World Quarterly, 23, 1 (2002): 137-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590220108216
  34. Scott, Allen John. On Hollywood: the Place, the Industry. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.
  35. Scott, Allen John. Geography and Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
  36. Scott, Allen John. Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199549306.001.0001
  37. Scott, Allen John, and Leriche, Frédéric. “Les ressorts géographiques de l’économie culturelle: du local au mondial”. L’Espace Géographique, 3 (2005): 207-222. https://doi.org/10.3917/eg.343.0207
  38. Scott, Allen John, and Frédéric Leriche. “Hollywood, un siècle d’industrie cinématographique”. In Leriche, Frédéric, Sylvie Daviet, Mariette Silvertin-Blanc, and Jean-Marc Zuliani, éds. L’économie culturelle et ses territoires. 29-41. Toulouse: PUM, 2008.
  39. Scott, Allen John, and Naomi Pope. “Hollywood, Vancouver, and the world: employment relocation and the emergence of satellite production centers in the motion-picture industry”. Environment and Planning A, 39, 6 (2007): 1364-1381. https://doi.org/10.1068/a38215
  40. Solnit, Rebecca. “Cinema City: Muybridge Inventing Movies, Hitchcock Making Vertigo... The Eyes of the Gods”. In Solnit, Rebecca, ed. Infinite City: A San Francisco Atlas. 23-30. Berkeley and Los Angeles: UC Press, 2010.
  41. Stein, Elie. “I Got my Start in San Francisco”. American Film, July-August. (1984): 30-35/72. Storper, Michael. The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy. New York: Guilford Press, 1997.
  42. Storper, Michael, and Richard Walker. The Capitalist Imperative: Territory, Technology, and Industrial Growth. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1989.
  43. Sturgeon, Timothy. “How Silicon Valley Came to Be”. In Kenney, Martin, ed. Understanding Silicon Valley. 15-47. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
  44. Talbot, Damien. “La dimension politique dans l’approche de la proximité”, Géographie, Economie, Société, 12, 2 (2010): 125-144. https://doi.org/10.3166/ges.12.125-144
  45. Torre, André and Damien Talbot. “Questionner la proximité”, Mondes sociaux, (2019); [online] https://sms.hypotheses.org/19070
  46. Walker, Richard. “Another Round of Globalization in San Francisco”, Urban Geography, 17, 1 (1996): 60-94. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.17.1.60
  47. Walker, Richard. The Country in the City: The Greening of the San Francisco Bay Area. Seattle: University of Washington Press. 2007.
  48. Walker, Richard. “The Island at the Center of the Bay”. In Horuichi, Lyenne, and Tanu Salankia, eds. Urban Reinventions. San Francisco’s Treasure Island. 26-45. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv105b9k8.7
  49. Walker, Richard. Pictures of a Gone City: Tech and the Dark Side of Prosperity in the San Francisco Bay Area. Oakland: PM Press, 2018.
  50. Wiley, Peter Booth. San Francisco: America’s Guide for Architecture and History Travellers. New York: Wiley ed., 2000.
  51. Zoetrope. “American Zoetrope: Dedicated to Creating Classics”. https://www.zoetrope.com/american-zoetrope/.
  52. Zook, Matthew. “The Geography of the Internet Industry, 1994-2000: Venture Capital, Internet Firms and Regional Development”. Ph. D. dissertation, Berkeley: UC Berkeley, 2001.