Corpo estranho nasal incomum: chips de celular: relato de caso

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-8047.2022.v48.37635

Keywords:

Nose disease, Nasal Obstruction, Foreign-Body Reaction, Case Report

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal foreign bodies are a reason for medical attention, either in clinics or in emergency departments. Most nasal foreign bodies occur in children and psychiatric patients. The diagnosis is usually clinical. If not removed, they can be enveloped by magnesium phosphate, calcium phosphate, or calcium carbonate, and eventually become stable hardened structures firmly adhered to the nasal walls called rhinoliths.

Aim: To describe a case of a patient with unusual nasal rhinolith with a previous diagnosis of neoplasia.

Case description: This report describes a case of a 39 year-old patient who presented a stable hardened structure in the floor of the right nasal fossa, with a long history of evolution. The patient had consultationswith specialists whose initial diagnosis was a tumor requiring urgent removal and was referred to the public service. During the evaluation at the otorhinolaryngology department, the patient was submitted to a clinical examination, computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses, and video-assisted fibroscopy, when the possibility of a nasal foreign body was raised. Thus the patient was taken to the outpatient clinic for removal under topical anesthesia; and the unexpected rhinolith was revealed (plastic bag with cell phone chips inside).

Conclusion: Despite the various possible differential diagnoses, including those of tumors, even despite the long time of evolution, rhinoliths should not be ignored as diagnostic hypotheses. Although the characteristics of the patient as adult age and preserved mental condition or even conditions of the location do not direct to such suspicion, as in the presented case.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Silva R, Costa VBS, Albuquerque AM. Primeiros socorros na retirada de corpos estranhos nos olhos, ouvido, nariz e garganta: revisão integrativa. Educ Ci Saúde.2017; 4(1):84-99.http://dx.doi.org/10.20438/ecs.v4i1.79

Maggiolo J, RubilarL, Giardi G. Cuerpo extraño en la via aérea en pediatria. Neumol Pediatr.2015;10(3):106-10.

Oyama LC. Foreign bodies of the ear, nose and throat. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 2019; 37(1):121-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2018.09.009

Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Kós AOA, Tomita S. Nasal foreignbodies: description of types and complications in 420 cases. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2006; 72(1):18-23.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992006000100004

Kalan A, TarrigM. Foreign bodies in the nasal cavities: a comprehensive review of the aetiology, diagnostic pointers, and therapeutic measures. Postgrad Med J. 2000; 76:484-7.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pmj.76.898.484

Okoye BCC,Onotai LO. Foreing bodies in the nose. Niger J Med. 2006; 15 (3):301-4.http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njm.v15i3.37235

Glynn F,Amin M, Kinsella J. Nasal foreing bodies in children: should they have a plain radiograph in the accident and emergency? Pediatric Emergency Care. 2008; 24(4):217-18.

Yeh B, Roberson JR. Nasal magnetic foreing body: a sticky topic. J Emerg Med. 2012; 43(2):319-21.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.02.013

Douglas AR. Use of nebulized adrenaline to aid expulsion of intra-nasal foreing bodies in children. J Laryngol Otol. 1996; 110(6):559-60.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100134267

Kadish H. Ear and nose foreingn bodies: "it`s all about the tools". ClinPediatr. 2005; 44(8):665-70.https://doi.org/10.1177/000992280504400803

Chatziavramidis A, Kondylidou-Sidira A, Stefanidis A, Soldatou S. Longstanding rhinolith leading to anatomical alterations of the ipsilateral inferior nasal meatus and turbinate. BMJ Case Rep 2010. 2010:1-4.https://casereports.bmj.com/content/2010/bcr.07.2010.3155

Gianisella G, Reis VS, Augusto TAM, Roithmann R, Constantino,MNC. Rinolito como diagnóstico diferencial de sintomas nasaispersistentes. Rev AMRIGS. 2012; 57(3):226-8.

Mastour ASA, Ghnnam WM, Zubaidi AH.Rhinolith: delayed presentation after a head trauma: a case report. Case Report Otolaryngol. 2012;(2012): 1-2.https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/492081

Ozdemir S, Akbas Y, Görgülü O, Selçuk T, Sayar C. Rhinolithiasis: review of 21 cases. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;24(6):136-9.https://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3553

Akkoca O, Tüzüner A, Demirci S, Ünlü C, Uzunkulaoğlu H, Arslan N, Aktar G. Patient characteristics and frequent localizations of rhinoliths. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 54(4):154-7. https://doi.org/10.5152/tao.2016.1773

Adib H , Natout MAE, Zaytoun G , Hadi UA. Rhinolithiasis: a misleading entity. Allergy Rhinol. 2018; 9:1-4.https://doi.org/10.1177/2152656718783596.

Yuca K, Çaksen H, Etlik O, Bayram I, Sakin YF, Dülger H, Kiriş M. The importance of rigid nasal endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of rhinolithiasis. AurisNasus Larynx. 2006; 33(1):19-22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2005.05.013

Ayub-ur-Rehman, Muhammad MN, Moallam FA. Endoscopy in rhinolithiasis. J CollPhysSurg Pak. 2012; 22(9):601-3.

Aziz Y, Chauhan J, Hasan SA, Hashmi SF. Staghorn rhinolith in nasopharynx: an unusual case. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;60(1):91-3.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-008-0029-6

Saibene AM , Bebi V, Borloni R, Felisati G. Rock, paper, endoscopy: a baffling case of rhinolith. BMJ Case Rep. 2013; 9:1-4.http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009147

Published

2022-07-07

How to Cite

1.
Capelo TC, Costa Pinto Ribeiro A, Tinôco Leite D, Maria Câmara da Luz N, Benini Guércio W. Corpo estranho nasal incomum: chips de celular: relato de caso. HU Rev [Internet]. 2022Jul.7 [cited 2024Nov.21];48:1-5. Available from: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/hurevista/article/view/37635

Issue

Section

Relato de Caso

Most read articles by the same author(s)